Wong Anita, Cooper Claudia, Evans Catherine J, Rawle Mark James, Walters Kate, Conroy Simon Paul, Davies Nathan
UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Wolfson Institute of Population Health-Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, Turner Street, London EC1, London E1 2AB, UK.
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf033.
Hospital at Home provides hospital-level type care at home, both remote and face-to-face by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. In practice, various different models are employed, but we do not know what older people, their family carers (carers) and healthcare professionals think of what works best for them. This review aimed to describe the various Hospital at Home models and synthesise literature exploring patient, carer and staff perspectives of Hospital at Home care for older people.
A systematic review of UK studies. Medline, Embase and CINAHL and grey literature were searched from 1991 to 2024, using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria; data were extracted from included papers. Tabulation, thematic grouping and concept mapping of themes were used to narratively synthesise the literature.
Twenty studies met eligibility. Hospital at Home models included admission avoidance and early discharge. Studies were largely positive regarding Hospital at Home, with benefits including home familiarity, enabling person-centred care and shared decision-making and provision of family carer support. Challenges included staff accessibility, patient and carer anxieties regarding the safety of virtual wards, coordination across sectors and older people using technology.
Provision of holistic, accessible and continuous care for older people in Hospital at Home services facilitated patient and carer empowerment, dignity and autonomy. There are gaps in our understanding and evidence surrounding paid care workers and informal carers' perspectives in UK settings, especially within rigorous Hospital at Home literature.
居家医院服务通过多学科医疗专业团队,以远程和面对面的方式在家中提供医院级护理。在实际操作中,采用了各种不同的模式,但我们并不清楚老年人、他们的家庭护理人员(护理者)和医疗专业人员认为哪种模式对他们最有效。本综述旨在描述各种居家医院模式,并综合探讨患者、护理者和工作人员对老年人居家医院护理看法的文献。
对英国研究进行系统综述。使用预定的纳入和排除标准,检索了1991年至2024年期间的Medline、Embase、CINAHL和灰色文献;从纳入的论文中提取数据。采用列表、主题分组和主题概念映射的方法对文献进行叙述性综合分析。
20项研究符合纳入标准。居家医院模式包括避免住院和早期出院。关于居家医院服务,研究大多持积极态度,其益处包括熟悉家庭环境、实现以患者为中心的护理和共同决策以及为家庭护理者提供支持。挑战包括工作人员的可及性、患者和护理者对虚拟病房安全性的担忧、跨部门协调以及老年人使用技术的问题。
居家医院服务为老年人提供全面、可及和持续的护理,有助于增强患者和护理者的权能、尊严和自主性。在英国背景下,我们对有偿护理工作者和非正式护理者观点的理解和证据存在差距,尤其是在严谨的居家医院文献方面。