Suppr超能文献

听神经与耳蜗核中动态范围调节的相似性。

Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei.

作者信息

Gibson D J, Young E D, Costalupes J A

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr;53(4):940-58. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.4.940.

Abstract

Rate versus level functions were recorded for responses to best-frequency (BF) tones of 116 cochlear nucleus units and 53 auditory-nerve fibers in the presence of interrupted tone backgrounds and continuous noise backgrounds of various intensities. The backgrounds shifted the dynamic ranges of rate-level functions to higher test intensities, so in the presence of backgrounds, rate saturation occurred at higher intensities than in quiet. The shift in saturation intensity evoked by each background was measured by comparing the rate-level function recorded with the background to one recorded without. The relation between change in saturation intensity and background intensity could be approximated by the formula (formula: see text) delta Isat is the shift in saturation intensity, I is the background intensity, theta is the threshold for evoking shift, and A is the ratio of shift to background intensity re theta. In the appendix, it is shown that A is a measure of a unit's ability to avoid saturation by the background stimulus. The optimal value of A is unity, at which point a unit's operating range is infinite. The value of A depended on BF for interrupted tone backgrounds, but not for continuous noise backgrounds. For BF less than 10 kHz, the mean value of A for tone backgrounds was 0.33 in the auditory nerve, 0.37 in the ventral cochlear nuclei (VCN), and 0.47 in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). The difference between auditory nerve and VCN was not statistically significant. For BF greater than 10 kHz, the mean A was 0.16 in auditory nerve and 0.30 in VCN. The mean value of A for noise backgrounds was 0.79 in auditory nerve, 0.86 in VCN, 0.86 in DCN units of response types II and III, and 1.04 in DCN type IV units. Only the differences between DCN type IV and the non-DCN unit groups were statistically significant. The qualitative changes produced in rate-level functions by tone and noise backgrounds were similar in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei except for DCN type IV units. The shifts in rate functions produced by interrupted tone backgrounds did not prevent saturation of the rate response at background intensities above the dynamic range of the unit as recorded in quiet. However, the rate response to test tones was preserved in the presence of all noise background levels used (up to a 30-dB spectrum level). The shift in rate function produced by the noise was almost sufficient to allow the unit to encode test intensity relative to noise background intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

在存在不同强度的间断纯音背景和连续噪声背景的情况下,记录了116个蜗神经核单元和53根听神经纤维对最佳频率(BF)纯音反应的发放率与强度函数。这些背景将发放率-强度函数的动态范围转移到更高的测试强度,因此在有背景的情况下,发放率饱和出现在比安静时更高的强度。通过比较有背景时记录的发放率-强度函数与无背景时记录的函数,测量了每种背景引起的饱和强度的变化。饱和强度变化与背景强度之间的关系可用公式(公式:见正文)近似表示,其中ΔIsat是饱和强度的变化,I是背景强度,θ是引起变化的阈值,A是相对于θ的变化与背景强度的比值。在附录中表明,A是一个单位避免被背景刺激饱和的能力的度量。A的最佳值为1,此时单位的工作范围是无限的。A的值在间断纯音背景下取决于BF,但在连续噪声背景下则不然。对于BF小于10kHz,在听神经中,纯音背景下A的平均值为0.33,在蜗腹侧核(VCN)中为0.37,在蜗背侧核(DCN)中为0.47。听神经和VCN之间的差异无统计学意义。对于BF大于10kHz,听神经中的平均A为0.16,VCN中为0.30。噪声背景下A的平均值在听神经中为0.79,在VCN中为0.86,在DCN的II型和III型反应单元中为0.86,在DCN的IV型单元中为1.04。只有DCN的IV型单元与非DCN单元组之间的差异有统计学意义。除了DCN的IV型单元外,听神经和蜗神经核中纯音和噪声背景在发放率-强度函数中产生的定性变化相似。间断纯音背景引起的发放率函数变化并不能防止在安静时记录的高于单位动态范围的背景强度下发放率反应的饱和。然而,在所有使用的噪声背景水平(高达30dB频谱水平)下,对测试纯音的发放率反应得以保留。噪声引起的发放率函数变化几乎足以使单位相对于噪声背景强度对测试强度进行编码。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验