• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希腊大陆一家综合医院治疗期间患者对医院餐饮服务满意度的评估。

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction With Hospital Foodservice During Treatment at a General Hospital in Mainland Greece.

作者信息

Potsi Foteini, Syngelakis Aristomenis

机构信息

Hellenic Open University, School of Social Sciences, MSc Programme in Health Units Administration, Patra, Greece.

Nutrition Department, General Hospital of Ioannina "G. Ηatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e70026. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70026.

DOI:10.1111/jhn.70026
PMID:39989396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11848813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate hospital foodservice is important to improve patient's nutritional status. Research aimed to evaluate patients' satisfaction with hospital foodservice during their treatment at a general hospital in Greece using a validated instrument, adding to the existing research.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was conducted on a random sample of patients aged > 18 years who were hospitalized for at least 2 days in the selected hospital between March and April 2022. The hospital applies a conventional cooking preparation system, a central distribution system, and a quality management system. Data were collected using a Greek-translated version of the "Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire", and analysed using descriptive measures, parametric and non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

In total, 202 questionnaires (response rate 87.7%) were included in the analysis. The majority (90.1%) stated an overall satisfaction of "good" or "very good". Questions related to "Staff & Service" received the highest scores, while questions related to "Food Quality" and "Meal Size" received the lowest. "Food Quality" was found to have the greatest effect on overall satisfaction. There were differences between wards. Men and younger patients were more likely to report hunger after and between meals.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital foodservice faces the challenge of catering to a range of nutritional needs of different patients. Systematic assessment of patient satisfaction is crucial to improving evidence-based, patient-centered care. Although patients' overall satisfaction with foodservice was high, reflection on the interpretation of results is required as patient satisfaction is a complex measure, and the study was conducted during a pandemic.

摘要

背景

充足的医院餐饮服务对于改善患者营养状况至关重要。本研究旨在使用经过验证的工具评估希腊一家综合医院患者在治疗期间对医院餐饮服务的满意度,以补充现有研究。

方法

于2022年3月至4月间,对在选定医院住院至少2天、年龄大于18岁的患者进行随机抽样横断面研究。该医院采用传统烹饪制备系统、中央配送系统和质量管理系统。使用希腊语翻译版的“急性护理医院餐饮服务患者满意度问卷”收集数据,并采用描述性统计、参数检验和非参数检验进行分析。

结果

共202份问卷(回复率87.7%)纳入分析。大多数(90.1%)表示总体满意度为“良好”或“非常好”。与“员工与服务”相关的问题得分最高,而与“食物质量”和“餐量”相关的问题得分最低。发现“食物质量”对总体满意度影响最大。各病房之间存在差异。男性和年轻患者更有可能在餐后和两餐之间报告饥饿。

结论

医院餐饮服务面临着满足不同患者一系列营养需求的挑战。系统评估患者满意度对于改善循证、以患者为中心的护理至关重要。尽管患者对餐饮服务的总体满意度较高,但由于患者满意度是一项复杂的指标,且该研究是在疫情期间进行的,因此需要对结果的解读进行反思。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11848813/e6bcd1e0b03f/JHN-38-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11848813/e6bcd1e0b03f/JHN-38-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11848813/e6bcd1e0b03f/JHN-38-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction With Hospital Foodservice During Treatment at a General Hospital in Mainland Greece.希腊大陆一家综合医院治疗期间患者对医院餐饮服务满意度的评估。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e70026. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70026.
2
Exploring patient satisfaction with hospital foodservice: A Swedish study using the Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.探讨患者对医院餐饮服务的满意度:瑞典使用急性护理医院餐饮服务患者满意度问卷进行的研究。
Nutr Diet. 2021 Nov;78(5):487-495. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12665. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Room Service Improves Nutritional Intake and Increases Patient Satisfaction While Decreasing Food Waste and Cost.客房送餐服务可改善营养摄入,提高患者满意度,同时减少食物浪费和降低成本。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):284-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Patients' evaluation of hospital foodservice quality in Italy: what do patients really value?意大利患者对医院餐饮服务质量的评价:患者真正看重的是什么?
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Apr;16(4):730-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003333. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
5
Foodservice quality in South African hospitals: patient experiences.南非医院的餐饮服务质量:患者体验
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):599-610. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2017-0213.
6
Patient-Centered Foodservice Model Improves Body Weight, Nutritional Intake and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment.以患者为中心的餐饮服务模式可改善癌症患者的体重、营养摄入和患者满意度。
Nutr Cancer. 2019;71(3):418-423. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1506490. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
A comparison of two measures of hospital foodservice satisfaction.医院餐饮服务满意度两种衡量方法的比较。
Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(1):70-5. doi: 10.1071/ah030070.
8
Determining the complexity of patient satisfaction with foodservices.确定患者对餐饮服务满意度的复杂性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Apr;94(4):394-8, 401; quiz 399-400. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)90093-0.
9
Determinants of foodservice satisfaction for patients in geriatrics/rehabilitation and residents in residential aged care.老年病学/康复科患者和养老院居民对餐饮服务满意度的决定因素。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):251-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
10
Consumer evaluation of hospital foodservice quality: an empirical investigation.消费者对医院餐饮服务质量的评价:一项实证研究。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(2-3):181-94. doi: 10.1108/09526860610651708.

本文引用的文献

1
Putting quality food on the tray: Factors associated with patients' perceptions of the hospital food experience.将优质食物放在托盘上:与患者对医院餐饮体验的看法相关的因素。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;35(1):81-93. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12929. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Clinical Nutrition and Human Rights. An International Position Paper.临床营养与人权:国际立场文件
Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;36(3):534-544. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10667. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Approaches to patient satisfaction measurement of the healthcare food services: A systematic review.
医疗食品服务患者满意度测量方法的研究进展:系统综述。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Apr;42:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Exploring patient satisfaction with hospital foodservice: A Swedish study using the Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.探讨患者对医院餐饮服务的满意度:瑞典使用急性护理医院餐饮服务患者满意度问卷进行的研究。
Nutr Diet. 2021 Nov;78(5):487-495. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12665. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Triggers of mental health problems among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in private care homes and domiciliary care agencies: Lived experiences of care workers in the Midlands region, UK.新冠疫情期间私营养老院和上门护理机构中一线医护人员心理健康问题的触发因素:英国中部地区护理人员的生活体验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):e370-e376. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13204. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Impact of electronic bedside meal ordering systems on dietary intake, patient satisfaction, plate waste and costs: A systematic literature review.电子床头点餐系统对饮食摄入、患者满意度、餐盘浪费和成本的影响:系统文献回顾。
Nutr Diet. 2020 Feb;77(1):103-111. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12600. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
7
Patient satisfaction reporting-a cohort study comparing reporting of patient satisfaction pre- and post-discharge from hospital.患者满意度报告——一项比较患者在出院前后报告满意度的队列研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):43-49. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Defining and quantifying preventable and non-preventable hospital-acquired malnutrition-A cohort study.定义和量化可预防和不可预防的医院获得性营养不良-队列研究。
Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;76(5):620-627. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12553. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
The Currently Available Literature on Inpatient Foodservices: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.住院餐饮服务的现有文献:系统评价和批判性评价。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jul;119(7):1118-1141.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
South African foodservice quality: inpatient's perceptions.南非餐饮服务质量:住院患者的看法。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Mar 11;32(2):447-458. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2018-0021.