Yadav Arun K, Ahsan Amra, Kumar Vijay, Banik Arun
Department of AIBAS, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of ASLP, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):101-106. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_570_24. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
Hearing amplification devices provide ample auditory input that can help to decrease the cognitive strain caused by hearing loss. Depending on the kind and severity of hearing loss, using hearing aids has variable effects on auditory working memory. This study looked into the auditory working memory capacity after using hearing aids for more than 6 months.
Sixty individuals of a mean age of 53.4 ± 6.07 years with severe to profound hearing loss in the age range of 40-60 years participated. Out of them, 30 individuals with a mean age of 53.5 ± 6.7 were using digital hearing aids and another 30 individuals with a mean age of 53.3 ± 5.4 years were not using a hearing aid. Forward and backward digit span task (DST) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) were investigated to estimate the auditory working memory capacity.
Mean MMSE scores of those individuals with severe to profound hearing loss (53.3 ± 5.43) using (HAU) a hearing aid (25.7 ± 2.97) and individuals not using (NHAU) a hearing aid (22.1 ± 5.11) were compared across each other. The result revealed that the mean MMSE score of HAU was significantly higher than the mean score of NHAU. The mean DST (forward, backward, and total) score of HAU (6.40 ± 1.47) was cosiderably higher than the mean score of NHAU (5.33 ± 1.12).
Results showed that mean MMSE and DST scores were higher in the HAU category, but when compared across the gender, no statistical differences were observed. The change in auditory working memory and other cognitive abilities were attributed to the usage duration of the hearing aids.
听力放大装置可提供充足的听觉输入,有助于减轻听力损失引起的认知负担。根据听力损失的类型和严重程度,使用助听器对听觉工作记忆有不同的影响。本研究调查了使用助听器超过6个月后的听觉工作记忆容量。
60名年龄在40 - 60岁之间、患有重度至极重度听力损失的个体参与研究,平均年龄为53.4 ± 6.07岁。其中,30名平均年龄为53.5 ± 6.7岁的个体使用数字助听器,另外30名平均年龄为53.3 ± 5.4岁的个体未使用助听器。通过前向和后向数字广度任务(DST)以及简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)来评估听觉工作记忆容量。
比较了重度至极重度听力损失且使用助听器(HAU)的个体(平均MMSE评分为25.7 ± 2.97,年龄53.3 ± 5.43岁)和未使用助听器(NHAU)的个体(平均MMSE评分为22.1 ± 5.11)的MMSE评分。结果显示,HAU组的平均MMSE评分显著高于NHAU组。HAU组的平均DST(前向、后向和总分)评分(6.40 ± 1.47)明显高于NHAU组(5.33 ± 1.12)。
结果表明,HAU组的平均MMSE和DST评分较高,但按性别比较时,未观察到统计学差异。听觉工作记忆和其他认知能力的变化归因于助听器的使用时长。