Suppr超能文献

欺骗的神经动力学:来自大脑状态功能磁共振成像研究的见解

Neural dynamics of deception: insights from fMRI studies of brain states.

作者信息

Jiang Weixiong, Li Lin, Xia Yulong, Farooq Sajid, Li Gang, Li Shuaiqi, Xu Jinhua, He Sailing, Wu Xiangyu, Huang Shoujun, Yuan Jing, Kong Dexing

机构信息

College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang China.

Nanbei Lake Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Haiyan, Zhejiang China.

出版信息

Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10222-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Deception is a complex behavior that requires greater cognitive effort than truth-telling, with brain states dynamically adapting to external stimuli and cognitive demands. Investigating these brain states provides valuable insights into the brain's temporal and spatial dynamics. In this study, we designed an experiment paradigm to efficiently simulate lying and constructed a temporal network of brain states. We applied the Louvain community clustering algorithm to identify characteristic brain states associated with lie-telling, inverse-telling, and truth-telling. Our analysis revealed six representative brain states with unique spatial characteristics. Notably, two distinct states-termed and -exhibited significant differences in fractional occupancy and average dwelling time. The truth-preferred state showed higher occupancy and dwelling time during truth-telling, while the lie-preferred state demonstrated these characteristics during lie-telling. Using the average z-score BOLD signals of these two states, we applied generalized linear models with elastic net regularization, achieving a classification accuracy of 88.46%, with a sensitivity of 92.31% and a specificity of 84.62% in distinguishing deception from truth-telling. These findings revealed representative brain states for lie-telling, inverse-telling, and truth-telling, highlighting two states specifically associated with truthful and deceptive behaviors. The spatial characteristics and dynamic attributes of these brain states indicate their potential as biomarkers of cognitive engagement in deception.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10222-4.

摘要

未标注

欺骗是一种复杂行为,比讲真话需要更大的认知努力,大脑状态会动态适应外部刺激和认知需求。研究这些大脑状态能为大脑的时空动态提供有价值的见解。在本研究中,我们设计了一种实验范式来有效模拟说谎,并构建了大脑状态的时间网络。我们应用Louvain社区聚类算法来识别与说谎、反向说谎和讲真话相关的特征大脑状态。我们的分析揭示了六种具有独特空间特征的代表性大脑状态。值得注意的是,两种不同的状态——称为 和 ——在分数占有率和平均停留时间上表现出显著差异。真相偏好状态在讲真话时显示出更高的占有率和停留时间,而谎言偏好状态在说谎时表现出这些特征。利用这两种状态的平均z分数BOLD信号,我们应用了带有弹性网正则化的广义线性模型,在区分欺骗和讲真话方面达到了88.46%的分类准确率,灵敏度为92.31%,特异性为84.62%。这些发现揭示了说谎、反向说谎和讲真话的代表性大脑状态,突出了两种与真实和欺骗行为特别相关的状态。这些大脑状态的空间特征和动态属性表明它们作为欺骗中认知参与生物标志物的潜力。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11571-025-10222-4获取的补充材料。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
The Role of Cognition in Dishonest Behavior.认知在不诚实行为中的作用。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 24;13(3):394. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030394.
6
Cognitive control and dishonesty.认知控制与不诚实行为。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
Meta-analytic connectivity modelling of deception-related brain regions.欺骗相关脑区的元分析连接建模。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0248909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248909. eCollection 2021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验