Makowska Agata, Ananthakrishnan Gayathri, Christ Michael, Dehmer Matthias
Cardiology, Hospital Centre of Biel, 2501 Biel, Switzerland.
Healthcare Management, Alfred Nobel Business School Switzerland, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;13(4):408. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040408.
The increasing utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field holds the potential to address the global shortage of doctors. However, various challenges, such as usability, privacy, inequality, and misdiagnosis, complicate its application. This literature review focuses on AI's role in cardiology, specifically its impact on the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms analyzing 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case-control studies across various settings. This review is registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number 531468). Seven significant studies were selected and included in our review. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. Co-CNN (with incorporated demographic data and clinical variables) demonstrated the highest weighted average sensitivity at 0.84. 2D-CNN models (with demographic features) showed a balanced performance with good sensitivity (0.62) and high specificity (0.82); Co-CNN models excelled in sensitivity (0.84) but had lower specificity (0.71). Traditional ECG criteria (SLV and CV) maintained high specificities but low sensitivities. Scatter plots revealed trends between demographic factors and performance metrics. AI algorithms can rapidly analyze ECG data with high sensitivity. The diagnostic accuracy of AI models is variable but generally comparable to classical criteria. Clinical data and the training population of AI algorithms play a critical role in their efficacy. Future research should focus on collecting diverse ECG data across different populations to improve the generalizability of AI algorithms.
人工智能(AI)在医学领域的应用日益广泛,有望解决全球医生短缺的问题。然而,诸如可用性、隐私、不平等和误诊等各种挑战使其应用变得复杂。本文献综述聚焦于AI在心脏病学中的作用,特别是其对分析12导联心电图(ECG)以检测左心室肥厚(LVH)的AI算法诊断准确性的影响。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,我们对PubMed、CENTRAL、谷歌学术、科学网和考科蓝图书馆进行了全面检索。符合条件的研究包括各种环境下的随机对照试验(RCT)、观察性研究和病例对照研究。本综述已在PROSPERO数据库注册(注册号531468)。我们选择了七项重要研究纳入综述。使用RevMan进行荟萃分析。联合卷积神经网络(Co-CNN,结合了人口统计学数据和临床变量)显示加权平均灵敏度最高,为0.84。二维卷积神经网络(2D-CNN)模型(具有人口统计学特征)表现出平衡的性能,灵敏度良好(0.62),特异性高(0.82);Co-CNN模型在灵敏度方面表现出色(0.84),但特异性较低(0.71)。传统的ECG标准(SLV和CV)保持高特异性但低灵敏度。散点图揭示了人口统计学因素与性能指标之间的趋势。AI算法可以高灵敏度快速分析ECG数据。AI模型的诊断准确性各不相同,但总体上与经典标准相当。临床数据和AI算法的训练人群对其疗效起着关键作用。未来的研究应专注于收集不同人群的多样化ECG数据,以提高AI算法的通用性。