Sanena Maria, Hagstrom Christine, Phiri Khumbo, Kalande Pericles, Songo John, Maruwo Linda, Phiri Sam, Dovel Kathryn, van Oosterhout Joep J
Partners in Hope, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;5(2):e0003818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003818. eCollection 2025.
While its prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa is high, intimate partner violence (IPV) is rarely reported during routine index case testing (ICT) services in Malawi. We retrospectively explored the occurrence of IPV in a large, PEPFAR-supported HIV care and treatment program, among people with HIV (PWH) who had previously accessed ICT services. Between July-August 2022, we enrolled PWH aged ≥18 years, at 15 health facilities, who had received ICT services as new ART-initiators <6 months ago. We used a validated World Health Organization tool to measure IPV in domains of physical, sexual and emotional abuse, and controlling behaviors in the past 12 months. To understand reasons for IPV non-reporting, we randomly selected a sub-set of PWH who had experienced IPV and healthcare workers (HCWs) providing ICT services, for in-depth interviews (IDIs). We enrolled 149 PWH, 71.8% were female, 58.4% married, mean age 34 (IQR 25-40) years. Overall IPV prevalence was 71.1% (95%CI: 63.8%-78.5%), 76.6% (95%CI 68.5%-84.8%) among females and 57.1% (95%CI: 41.5%-72.8%) among males. Controlling behavior (65.7%) was the most common form of IPV, followed by physical (24.8%), emotional (33.6%), and sexual abuse (20.8%). Twenty-two percent related the IPV event to the HIV diagnosis. We analyzed 24 IDIs (15 PWH, 9 HCWs). Only two PWH (13.3%) had reported IPV to a HCW. Major barriers to reporting IPV for PWH were believing it is inappropriate discussing IPV with HCWs, concerns that discussing IPV would cause delays for others, and limited privacy. HCWs attributed IPV non-reporting to insufficient screening, high workload among ICT staff, negative HCW attitudes, and PWH's fear of unintended consequences of IPV reporting. IPV prevalence was high among PWH who had recently undergone ICT, but IPV is often not reported. Multiple barriers to IPV reporting must be addressed urgently, given IPV's adverse impact on HIV treatment and other health outcomes.
虽然亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的发生率很高,但在马拉维的常规索引病例检测(ICT)服务中,这种情况很少被报告。我们回顾性地探讨了在一个由总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)支持的大型艾滋病毒护理和治疗项目中,曾接受过ICT服务的艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中IPV的发生情况。在2022年7月至8月期间,我们在15个医疗机构招募了年龄≥18岁、在6个月前作为新启动抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)者接受过ICT服务的PWH。我们使用经过验证的世界卫生组织工具,在身体、性和情感虐待以及过去12个月内的控制行为等领域测量IPV。为了解IPV未报告的原因,我们随机选择了一部分经历过IPV的PWH和提供ICT服务的医护人员(HCW)进行深入访谈(IDI)。我们招募了149名PWH,其中71.8%为女性,58.4%已婚,平均年龄34岁(四分位间距25 - 40岁)。总体IPV患病率为71.1%(95%置信区间:63.8% - 78.5%),女性为76.6%(95%置信区间68.5% - 84.8%),男性为57.1%(95%置信区间:41.5% - 72.8%)。控制行为(65.7%)是IPV最常见的形式,其次是身体虐待(24.8%)、情感虐待(33.6%)和性虐待(20.8%)。22%的IPV事件与艾滋病毒诊断有关。我们分析了24次IDI(15名PWH,9名HCW)。只有两名PWH(13.3%)曾向HCW报告过IPV。PWH报告IPV的主要障碍包括认为与HCW讨论IPV不合适、担心讨论IPV会导致他人延误以及隐私受限。HCW将IPV未报告归因于筛查不足、ICT工作人员工作量大、HCW态度消极以及PWH对IPV报告意外后果的恐惧。在最近接受过ICT的PWH中,IPV患病率很高,但IPV往往未被报告。鉴于IPV对艾滋病毒治疗和其他健康结果有不利影响,必须紧急解决IPV报告的多重障碍。