Madany Peerzada, Olsen Donald, Makled Sarah Osama, Cram Erik, Page Sarah, Bonner Hannah, McLean Joan E, Stevens David, Li Mingyue, Hou Liyuan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA; Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA.
Oceanography Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Water Res. 2025 Jun 1;277:123322. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123322. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) have the potential to produce cyanotoxins, which pose significant health risks to both humans and animals. The gold standard methods for monitoring cyanoHABs involve enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), liquid chromatography combined with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and manual cell counting under microscopy. However, these techniques, while effective, are costly and time-consuming, which may not be optimal for timely decision-making to safeguard public health. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) offers a complementary approach that serves as an indicator of the potential for toxin production. It provides accurate results with a rapid turnaround time and high throughput capacity, and greater affordability. To assess the reliability of qPCR in predicting toxin production and determining when toxin levels exceed recreational advisory thresholds, we conducted experiments utilizing two DNA extraction methods for qPCR testing: RapidDNA and ClassicDNA. Sampling was conducted across nine water bodies in Utah throughout the recreational season from June 1 to October 31, 2023. We targeted cyanotoxin-encoding genes mainly associated with microcystins, the dominant cyanotoxin reported for these water bodies, for qPCR analysis. Toxin levels were measured using both ELISA and LC-MS/MS with cyanobacteria cell counting conducted as a reference. Out of nine water bodies studied, cyanoHABs were detected in five (i.e., Utah Lake, and Deer Creek, Echo, Schofield, and Pineview Reservoirs). Analysis of the data revealed a significant linear relationship between both the qPCR results of mcyE (associated with microcystin production) obtained from RapidDNA and ClassicDNA methods, and the levels of microcystins measured by ELISA and LC-MS/MS. RapidDNA qPCR methods offer a potential warning tool for indicating toxin production during blooming events, though this method is not suitable for determining risk during the pre-blooming period. Conversely, ClassicDNA methods can be utilized during the pre-blooming period to prepare for potential blooms. These results provide insight into the genetic potential of blooms around the state to produce microcystins. Findings can be implemented in both Recreational Water Quality and Drinking Water programs nationally.
蓝藻有害藻华(cyanoHABs)有可能产生蓝藻毒素,这对人类和动物都构成重大健康风险。监测蓝藻有害藻华的金标准方法包括酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、液相色谱与三重四极杆质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)以及显微镜下人工细胞计数。然而,这些技术虽然有效,但成本高昂且耗时,对于及时做出保障公众健康的决策而言可能并非最佳选择。定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)提供了一种补充方法,可作为毒素产生潜力的指标。它能在短时间内提供准确结果,具有高通量能力且成本更低。为了评估qPCR在预测毒素产生以及确定毒素水平何时超过娱乐用水建议阈值方面的可靠性,我们使用两种DNA提取方法(RapidDNA和ClassicDNA)进行qPCR测试实验。在2023年6月1日至10月31日的娱乐季节期间,对犹他州的九个水体进行了采样。我们主要针对与微囊藻毒素相关的蓝藻毒素编码基因进行qPCR分析,微囊藻毒素是这些水体中报告的主要蓝藻毒素。使用ELISA和LC-MS/MS测量毒素水平,并以蓝藻细胞计数作为参考。在所研究的九个水体中,在五个水体(即犹他湖、鹿溪、回声、斯科菲尔德和派恩维尤水库)检测到了蓝藻有害藻华。数据分析显示,从RapidDNA和ClassicDNA方法获得的mcyE(与微囊藻毒素产生相关)的qPCR结果与通过ELISA和LC-MS/MS测量的微囊藻毒素水平之间存在显著的线性关系。RapidDNA qPCR方法为指示藻华事件期间的毒素产生提供了一种潜在的预警工具,不过该方法不适用于确定藻华前期的风险。相反,ClassicDNA方法可在藻华前期使用,为潜在的藻华做准备。这些结果深入了解了该州各地藻华产生微囊藻毒素的遗传潜力。研究结果可在全国的娱乐用水水质和饮用水项目中应用。