Trojanowski Maciej, Michalek Irmina Maria, Kubiak Anna, Taraszkiewicz Łukasz, Kycler Witold
Greater Poland Cancer Registry Greater Poland Cancer Centre Poznan Poland.
Department of Cancer Pathology Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI) Warsaw Poland.
Int J Med Inform. 2025 May;197:105821. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105821. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is a cornerstone in medical data standardisation worldwide. The newly released ICD-11, with its updated chapter on neoplasms, is expected to revolutionise cancer data collection, particularly in European healthcare system. However, significant challenges to implementation remain, especially when transitioning from ICD-10, which has long underpinned cancer registration. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing ICD-11 in European cancer registries and healthcare system by examining its coding structure for neoplasms, particularly its ability to replace ICD-10 in existing cancer data collection processes.
The analysis focused on ICD-11 Chapter 2 "Neoplasms", including pre-coordination and post-coordination coding structures. A comprehensive mapping of ICD-10 to ICD-11 codes was performed for cancer site, morphology, grade, stage, laterality and prognostic factors. Additionally, tools for coding validation and their applications in registries and hospital IT systems were reviewed. Results were assessed for accuracy, consistency, and ease of implementation.
ICD-11 allows for more detailed coding of neoplasms, especially through post-coordination, which enhances precision in capturing tumour subtypes and prognostic factors. Nevertheless, inconsistencies were observed in grading and staging systems, allowing for invalid combinations. Mapping between ICD-10 and ICD-11 also revealed gaps, particularly in representing complex cancer diagnoses.
While ICD-11 presents advanced coding options for cancer data, its complexity and the lack of validation mechanisms present challenges for immediate use in cancer registries. The transition from ICD-10 will necessitate extensive training, improved mapping tools, and the introduction of validation systems to ensure accurate data collection. Cancer registries are well-suited to support this transition, but further refinements to ICD-11 are essential before full adoption.
《国际疾病分类》(ICD)是全球医学数据标准化的基石。新发布的ICD - 11及其更新的肿瘤章节,有望彻底改变癌症数据收集方式,尤其是在欧洲医疗体系中。然而,实施过程中仍存在重大挑战,特别是从长期支撑癌症登记的ICD - 10过渡时。本研究旨在通过检查其肿瘤编码结构,特别是其在现有癌症数据收集过程中取代ICD - 10的能力,评估在欧洲癌症登记处和医疗体系中实施ICD - 11的可行性。
分析聚焦于ICD - 11第二章“肿瘤”,包括预协调和后协调编码结构。对癌症部位、形态学、分级、分期、左右侧性和预后因素进行了ICD - 10到ICD - 11编码的全面映射。此外,还审查了编码验证工具及其在登记处和医院信息技术系统中的应用。对结果进行了准确性、一致性和实施便利性评估。
ICD - 11允许对肿瘤进行更详细的编码,特别是通过后协调,这提高了捕获肿瘤亚型和预后因素的精度。然而,在分级和分期系统中观察到不一致情况,存在无效组合。ICD - 10和ICD - 11之间的映射也显示出差距,特别是在表示复杂癌症诊断方面。
虽然ICD - 11为癌症数据提供了先进的编码选项,但其复杂性和缺乏验证机制给在癌症登记处立即使用带来了挑战。从ICD - 10过渡将需要广泛的培训、改进的映射工具以及引入验证系统,以确保准确的数据收集。癌症登记处非常适合支持这一过渡,但在全面采用之前,对ICD - 11进行进一步完善至关重要。