Suppr超能文献

非高密度和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低对他汀类药物临床疗效的试验水平替代指标

Trial-level Surrogacy of non-High-Density and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction on the Clinical Efficacy of Statins.

作者信息

Liaigre Léa, Guigui Alicia, Manceau Marc, Cracowski Jean-Luc, Khouri Charles, Roustit Matthieu

机构信息

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm CIC1406, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm U1300, HP2, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf016.

Abstract

AIMS

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) are prognostic factors of cardiovascular risk. However, their validity as trial-level surrogates for cardiovascular outcomes is debated. This study aimed to determine whether LDL-c and non-HDL-c are reliable surrogates for cardiovascular events in statin trials, and to explore discrepancies in previous studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing statin efficacy versus placebo or usual care on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. We search studies published between 1987 and August 2023 from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Baseline lipid levels, absolute rate differences (ARD), and hazard ratios or risk ratios (RR) for major cardiovascular events and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality were analysed. Weighted linear regressions between log RR or ARD, and absolute difference in non-HDL-c or LDL-c were performed. The coefficients of determination (R2trial) were calculated, with their 95%CI computed through bootstrapping. The surrogate threshold effect (STE) was also estimated. Twenty RCTs and 194,686 participants were included, with a median follow-up of 4.85 years. Statin treatment showed significant efficacy in improving all clinical outcomes. However, the association between treatment effects on LDL-c or non-HDL-c reduction and clinical outcomes was weak. The R²trial were ranging from 0 to 0.1 for LDL-c, and from 0 to 0.04 for non-HDL-c. The STE for MACE was 0.76 (0.36-1.69) mmol/L for LDL-c, and 0.87 (0.49-2.19) mmol/L for non-HDL-c.

CONCLUSION

Neither LDL-c nor non-HDL-c demonstrated trial-level surrogacy for predicting treatment effects on mortality and cardiovascular events in statin trials. Although they are relevant biomarkers for the follow-up of patients treated with statins, their reduction does not reliably predict a similar reduction in cardiovascular risk. As such, they should not be used as pivotal evidence in drug trials.

摘要

目的

低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-c)是心血管疾病风险的预后因素。然而,它们作为心血管结局试验水平替代指标的有效性存在争议。本研究旨在确定在他汀类药物试验中,LDL-c和non-HDL-c是否是心血管事件的可靠替代指标,并探讨既往研究中的差异。

方法与结果

我们对评估他汀类药物与安慰剂或常规治疗相比在全因死亡率和心血管事件方面疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析进行了一项综合评价。我们检索了1987年至2023年8月期间发表于PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的研究。分析了基线血脂水平、主要心血管事件以及全因或心血管死亡率的绝对率差(ARD)和风险比或危险比(RR)。对log RR或ARD与non-HDL-c或LDL-c的绝对差值进行加权线性回归分析。计算决定系数(R2trial),并通过自抽样计算其95%置信区间。还估计了替代阈值效应(STE)。纳入了20项RCT和194,686名参与者,中位随访时间为4.85年。他汀类药物治疗在改善所有临床结局方面显示出显著疗效。然而,LDL-c或non-HDL-c降低的治疗效果与临床结局之间的关联较弱。LDL-c的R²trial范围为0至0.1,non-HDL-c的R²trial范围为0至0.04。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的STE对于LDL-c为0.76(0.36 - 1.69)mmol/L,对于non-HDL-c为0.87(0.49 - 2.19)mmol/L。

结论

在他汀类药物试验中,LDL-c和non-HDL-c均未表现出能够在试验水平替代预测死亡率和心血管事件的治疗效果。尽管它们是他汀类药物治疗患者随访的相关生物标志物,但其降低并不能可靠地预测心血管风险的类似降低。因此,它们不应作为药物试验的关键证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验