Qi Hongchao, Wood Angela M, Kaptoge Stephen, McMahon Amy, Mehenny Susan, Kingston Nathalie, Ouwehand Willem H, Danesh John, Roberts David J, Di Angelantonio Emanuele, Kim Lois G
BHF Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Donor Health and Behaviour, Cambridge, UK.
Transfusion. 2025 Apr;65(4):696-707. doi: 10.1111/trf.18165. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
In England, blood donors with low hemoglobin concentration are deferred following on-session testing to prevent donations below regulatory thresholds, thereby protecting donors' health and blood supply quality. However, deferrals are costly, time-consuming and may discourage donors. Post-donation testing (PDT), where hemoglobin levels are measured after donation, offer potential alternatives as used in some European countries.
We compared four PDT strategies to the current approach: (A) no on-session testing, (B) on-session testing if low hemoglobin at previous visit, (C) on-session testing if low/medium hemoglobin at previous visit, all with delayed reinvitation if low hemoglobin at previous donation, and (D) on-session testing if low/medium hemoglobin at previous visit without delayed reinvitations. We employed discrete event simulation modeling, informed by data collected from 16,941 donors returning under the current strategy in England, to simulate and compare total donations, under-threshold donations, and deferrals for each strategy over 18 months.
Strategy A eliminated deferrals but led to increased under-threshold donations compared to the current strategy in men (6.5% vs. 2.3%) and women (11.8% vs. 4.5%). Strategies B-D reduced deferrals rates for men (1.0%-3.7% vs. 5.5%) and women (2.2%-6.3% vs. 8.9%) but showed slightly higher under-threshold donations in men (3.0%-5.1% vs. 2.3%) and women (5.3%-8.8% vs. 4.5%). Strategies with more on-session testing had lower under-threshold donations.
PDT strategies incorporating on-session testing for low/medium hemoglobin at previous visits could reduce deferrals while maintaining a low proportion of under-threshold donations, thereby balancing donor safety with operational efficiency.
在英国,血红蛋白浓度低的献血者在采血期间检测后会被延期献血,以防止捐献的血液低于监管阈值,从而保护献血者的健康和血液供应质量。然而,延期献血成本高昂、耗时且可能使献血者气馁。献血后检测(PDT),即在献血后测量血红蛋白水平,在一些欧洲国家已被采用,提供了潜在的替代方案。
我们将四种PDT策略与当前方法进行了比较:(A)采血期间不进行检测,(B)如果前次就诊时血红蛋白水平低则在采血期间检测,(C)如果前次就诊时血红蛋白水平低/中等则在采血期间检测,若前次献血时血红蛋白水平低则均延迟再次邀请,以及(D)如果前次就诊时血红蛋白水平低/中等则在采血期间检测且不延迟再次邀请。我们采用离散事件模拟模型,根据从英国当前策略下回访的16941名献血者收集的数据,模拟并比较了每种策略在18个月内的总献血量、低于阈值的献血量和延期献血情况。
与当前策略相比,策略A消除了延期献血,但导致男性低于阈值的献血量增加(6.5%对2.3%),女性也是如此(11.8%对4.5%)。策略B - D降低了男性(1.0% - 3.7%对5.5%)和女性(2.2% - 6.3%对8.9%)的延期献血率,但男性低于阈值的献血量略高(3.0% - 5.1%对2.3%),女性也是如此(5.3% - 8.8%对4.5%)。采血期间检测更多的策略低于阈值的献血量较低。
结合对前次就诊时低/中等血红蛋白水平进行采血期间检测的PDT策略可以减少延期献血,同时保持低于阈值的献血量比例较低,从而在献血者安全与运营效率之间取得平衡。