Geometric Self-Supervised Learning: A Novel AI Approach Towards Quantitative and Explainable Diabetic Retinopathy Detection.

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults. Early detection is crucial to reducing DR-related vision loss risk but is fraught with challenges. Manual detection is labor-intensive and often misses tiny DR lesions, necessitating automated detection.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate an annotation-free deep learning strategy for the automatic detection of exudates and bleeding spots on color fundus photography (CFP) images and ultrawide field (UWF) retinal images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three cohorts were created: two CFP cohorts (Kaggle-CFP and E-Ophtha) and one UWF cohort. Kaggle-CFP was used for algorithm development, while E-Ophtha, with manually annotated DR-related lesions, served as the independent test set. For additional independent testing, 50 DR-positive cases from both the Kaggle-CFP and UWF cohorts were manually outlined for bleeding and exudate spots. The remaining cases were used for algorithm training. A multiscale contrast-based shape descriptor transformed DR-verified retinal images into contrast fields. High-contrast regions were identified, and local image patches from abnormal and normal areas were extracted to train a U-Net model. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positive rates based on manual annotations in the independent test sets.

RESULTS

Our trained model on the independent CFP cohort achieved high sensitivities for detecting and segmenting DR lesions: microaneurysms (91.5%, 9.04 false positives per image), hemorrhages (92.6%, 2.26 false positives per image), hard exudates (92.3%, 7.72 false positives per image), and soft exudates (90.7%, 0.18 false positives per image). For UWF images, the model's performance varied by lesion size. Bleeding detection sensitivity increased with lesion size, from 41.9% (6.48 false positives per image) for the smallest spots to 93.4% (5.80 false positives per image) for the largest. Exudate detection showed high sensitivity across all sizes, ranging from 86.9% (24.94 false positives per image) to 96.2% (6.40 false positives per image), though false positive rates were higher for smaller lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiments demonstrate the feasibility of training a deep learning neural network for detecting and segmenting DR-related lesions without relying on their manual annotations.