Bilika Paraskevi, Nijs Jo, Billis Evdokia, Dimitriadis Zacharias, Paliouras Achilleas, Savvoulidou Konstantina, Strimpakos Nikolaos, Kapreli Eleni
Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35100 Lamia, Greece.
Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1179. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041179.
The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recently introduced clinical criteria and a grading system to identify nociplastic pain, marking a pivotal step toward improving diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the IASP criteria using clinical vignettes, assessing their effectiveness in identifying nociplastic pain in clinical settings. A reliability and diagnostic accuracy study was conducted using 32 clinical vignettes based on the literature and pre-existing clinical data. The vignettes represented patients with and without the characteristics of nociplastic pain and were reviewed independently by two expert physiotherapists. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were evaluated with a 1-month interval between assessments. Criterion validity was analyzed by comparing the IASP criteria against the standardized vignettes as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. The IASP criteria demonstrated moderate-to-perfect intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.71-1.00, < 0.05) and weak-to-perfect inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.52-1.00, < 0.05). Criterion validity was moderate (κ = 0.68), with strong specificity (89.0%) and moderate sensitivity (69.0%). Positive and negative predictive values were high at 81.8% and 81.0%, respectively, supporting the criteria's accuracy in identifying and excluding nociplastic pain. The IASP criteria for nociplastic pain exhibited satisfactory reliability and criterion validity in this preliminary study, particularly after initial rater familiarization. Future research should evaluate their application in real-world clinical settings, explore concurrent and prognostic validity, and involve a broader range of raters to enhance generalizability.
国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)近期推出了用于识别伤害感受性疼痛的临床标准和分级系统,这标志着在提高诊断准确性方面迈出了关键一步。本研究旨在使用临床病例 vignettes 评估 IASP 标准的可靠性和有效性,评估其在临床环境中识别伤害感受性疼痛的有效性。基于文献和既往临床数据,使用 32 个临床病例 vignettes 进行了一项可靠性和诊断准确性研究。这些病例 vignettes 代表了有和没有伤害感受性疼痛特征的患者,并由两名专家物理治疗师独立进行审查。评估之间间隔 1 个月来评估评分者间和评分者内的可靠性。通过将 IASP 标准与作为参考标准的标准化病例 vignettes 进行比较来分析标准效度。计算敏感性、特异性和预测值以评估诊断准确性。IASP 标准显示出评分者内中等至完美的一致性(κ = 0.71 - 1.00,<0.05)和评分者间弱至完美的一致性(κ = 0.52 - 1.00,<0.05)。标准效度中等(κ = 0.68),特异性强(89.0%),敏感性中等(69.0%)。阳性和阴性预测值分别高达 81.8%和 81.0%,支持该标准在识别和排除伤害感受性疼痛方面的准确性。在这项初步研究中,IASP 伤害感受性疼痛标准表现出令人满意的可靠性和标准效度,特别是在评分者初步熟悉之后。未来的研究应评估其在实际临床环境中的应用,探索同时效度和预后效度,并纳入更广泛的评分者群体以提高普遍性。