Yang Wenpu, Wang Jinzheng, Zhao Zichen, Cui Yixiong
Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
School of Sports Engineering (China Sports Big Data Center), Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 9;25(4):1031. doi: 10.3390/s25041031.
Player-tracking systems provide vital time-motion and tactical data for analyzing athletic performance. Ultra-wideband (UWB) systems are promising for racquet sports due to their accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared to GNSS and optical systems. This study evaluated the accuracy of a UWB tracking system (GenGee Insait KS) for tennis-specific movements by comparing it with an optical motion capture system (VICON). Ten amateur players (International Tennis Numbers: 2-5) participated, performing seven exercises, including warm-up, agility drills, and tactical drills, with and without racquets. Raw data from both systems were processed to calculate the distances traversed. The average root mean square error between the two systems was 0.65 m (X-axis) and 0.76 m (Y-axis). Significant measurement discrepancies were observed (standardized mean difference: 0.86-1.95), except for jogging and walking exercises ( > 0.05). The overall percentage error was 16.29%. The intraclass correlation coefficient for distance measurements was 0.91, indicating good reliability. Tasks involving rapid acceleration and directional changes, such as the spider run, exhibited larger errors (mean bias: 4.13 m, effect size: 1.03). While the UWB system demonstrated acceptable accuracy for steady movements, it showed notable discrepancies during high-speed, tennis-specific activities. Overestimation due to arm movement and hip rotation suggests caution when applying arm-mounted UWB devices in training and competitive settings.
运动员追踪系统为分析运动表现提供了至关重要的时间-动作和战术数据。与全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)和光学系统相比,超宽带(UWB)系统因其准确性和成本效益,在球拍类运动中颇具前景。本研究通过将超宽带追踪系统(GenGee Insait KS)与光学动作捕捉系统(VICON)进行比较,评估了该系统在网球特定动作方面的准确性。十名业余球员(国际网球编号:2-5)参与其中,进行了七项练习,包括热身、敏捷性训练和战术训练,训练时有的使用球拍,有的不使用球拍。对两个系统的原始数据进行处理,以计算移动的距离。两个系统之间的平均均方根误差在X轴上为0.65米,在Y轴上为0.76米。观察到存在显著的测量差异(标准化平均差:0.86-1.95),慢跑和步行练习除外(>0.05)。总体百分比误差为16.29%。距离测量的组内相关系数为0.91,表明可靠性良好。涉及快速加速和方向变化的任务,如蜘蛛跑,表现出较大的误差(平均偏差:4.13米,效应大小:1.03)。虽然超宽带系统在稳定动作方面显示出可接受的准确性,但在高速、网球特定活动中存在明显差异。手臂运动和髋部旋转导致的高估表明,在训练和比赛环境中应用手臂佩戴式超宽带设备时需谨慎。