Suppr超能文献

对精英网球运动员进行动态拉伸和大负荷热身策略后的表现增强。

Post-activation performance enhancement of dynamic stretching and heavy load warm-up strategies in elite tennis players.

机构信息

Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University Isabel I, Burgos, Spain.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(3):413-423. doi: 10.3233/BMR-191710.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the potential post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects of two different warm-up strategies, involving dynamic stretching (DS) or heavy load leg press (HL) on several key physical qualities in tennis players.

METHODS

Twenty-six elite male tennis players (age: 19.22 ± 4.20 years; body mass: 67.37 ± 8.19 kg; height: 1.77 ± 0.07 m) performed both warm-ups, with 48-hours between protocols (DS and HL), performed in a randomized order. Pre- and post-tests included: countermovement jump, 5-m and 10-m sprint, 5-0-5 agility test, and hip extension and flexion range-of-motion which were performed before and after DS and HL warm-up protocols.

RESULTS

The DS warm-up led to substantial improvements in 5-m and 10-m sprint, 5-0-5 agility test, countermovement jump, and also to higher hip flexion range-of-motion. The HL warm-up caused impairments in 5-m and 10-m sprints, but improvements in 5-0-5 agility test, countermovement jump and hip extension range-of-motion. Compared to HL, DS warm-up induced possibly to likely positive effects on 5-m and 10-m linear sprint performance, as well as in hip flexion range-of-motion. Nevertheless, no differences in performance improvements in 5-0-5 agility test, countermovement jump and hip extension range-of-motion were found when comparing DS and HL warm-up protocols.

CONCLUSION

DS seems to be more effective than HL when performing a short warm-up protocol in elite tennis players.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种不同热身策略(动态拉伸[DS]或大负荷腿推[HL])对网球运动员多项关键身体素质的潜在激活后表现增强(PAPE)效果。

方法

26 名优秀男性网球运动员(年龄:19.22±4.20 岁;体重:67.37±8.19kg;身高:1.77±0.07m)分别进行两种热身,两种热身之间间隔 48 小时(DS 和 HL),并以随机顺序进行。预测试和后测试包括:纵跳、5m 和 10m 冲刺、5-0-5 敏捷测试以及髋关节伸展和屈曲活动度,这些测试在 DS 和 HL 热身方案前后进行。

结果

DS 热身导致 5m 和 10m 冲刺、5-0-5 敏捷测试、纵跳以及髋关节屈曲活动度有显著提高。HL 热身导致 5m 和 10m 冲刺受到损害,但 5-0-5 敏捷测试、纵跳和髋关节伸展活动度得到改善。与 HL 相比,DS 热身可能对 5m 和 10m 线性冲刺表现以及髋关节屈曲活动度产生积极影响。然而,在比较 DS 和 HL 热身方案时,在 5-0-5 敏捷测试、纵跳和髋关节伸展活动度的性能提高方面没有发现差异。

结论

在对优秀网球运动员进行短时间热身时,DS 似乎比 HL 更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验