Li Qingyuan, Zhou Dong, Chu Mihai, Liu Zhongqing, Yang Liangtao, Wu Wei, Ning De, Li Wenyuan, Liu Xingbo, Li Jie, Passerini Stefano, Wang Jun
Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering & Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
School of Advanced Energy, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, P. R. China.
Chem Soc Rev. 2025 Mar 31;54(7):3441-3474. doi: 10.1039/d4cs00797b.
The electrification of transportation is an important contributor to reducing global carbon dioxide emissions. However, this progress is constrained by anxiety regarding the driving range of vehicles, which is well recognized to originate from the low specific energy of the employed state-of-the-art energy storage devices. Therefore, further promoting the specific energy of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an inevitable need, where the development of cathode materials with high energy densities, high specific capacity and/or high working voltage, is essential. Accordingly, numerous research efforts are ongoing worldwide, where several materials stand out, including LiCoO (LCO), Ni-rich oxides and Li-rich cathodes, mainly because of their potential to deliver high capacities when operating at high voltages. However, the elevated operating voltage turns out to be a double-sided sword for these materials as achieving high specific capacity is always accompanied by the oxygen redox process, which shows unsatisfactory reversibility and has a significant impact on their structure stability and electrochemical performance. Consequently, understanding the failure mechanism of anionic redox chemistry and finding solutions to this issue are crucial for realizing the practical application of these high-voltage materials. Although many studies have been reported on the anionic redox chemistry of different materials, the corresponding reviews have predominantly focused on Li-rich cathode materials. Hence, the reviews on high-voltage LCO and Ni-rich oxides remain incomplete, and a unified understanding of their behavior at high voltages has not been established yet. This lack of comprehensive understanding has hindered the further development and application of high-voltage cathode materials. Thus, this review highlights the similarities and differences in the anionic redox chemistry of LCO, Li-rich and Ni-rich high-voltage cathode materials, emphasizing on a unified mechanistic picture and the related challenges and countermeasures. We aim to provide an outlook for future guidelines in material exploration with anionic redox chemistry, thus unlocking the full potential of high-voltage LIBs for diverse applications.
交通运输的电气化是减少全球二氧化碳排放的重要因素。然而,这一进展受到车辆续航里程焦虑的制约,众所周知,这种焦虑源于所采用的先进储能装置的比能量较低。因此,进一步提高锂离子电池(LIBs)的比能量是必然需求,其中开发具有高能量密度、高比容量和/或高工作电压的阴极材料至关重要。相应地,全球范围内正在进行大量研究工作,有几种材料脱颖而出,包括LiCoO(LCO)、富镍氧化物和富锂阴极,主要是因为它们在高电压下运行时具有提供高容量的潜力。然而,对于这些材料而言,升高的工作电压却是一把双刃剑,因为实现高比容量总是伴随着氧还原过程,而该过程的可逆性不尽人意,并且对其结构稳定性和电化学性能有重大影响。因此,了解阴离子氧化还原化学的失效机制并找到解决该问题的方法对于实现这些高电压材料的实际应用至关重要。尽管已经有许多关于不同材料的阴离子氧化还原化学的研究报道,但相应的综述主要集中在富锂阴极材料上。因此,关于高电压LCO和富镍氧化物的综述仍然不完整,尚未建立对它们在高电压下行为的统一认识。这种缺乏全面理解的情况阻碍了高电压阴极材料的进一步发展和应用。因此,本综述突出了LCO、富锂和富镍高电压阴极材料在阴离子氧化还原化学方面的异同,强调统一的机理图景以及相关挑战和对策。我们旨在为未来基于阴离子氧化还原化学的材料探索指南提供展望,从而释放高电压LIBs在各种应用中的全部潜力。