Descamps Alexandre, Jacquet-Lagrèze Matthias, Aussal Thomas, Fellahi Jean-Luc, Ruste Martin
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01271-5.
Capillary Refill Time (CRT) is a valuable metric to assess cutaneous perfusion. Its prognostic value in patients with acute circulatory failure has been reported as improved when the measurement is standardized. The DiCART™ device is a fully automated CRT measurement tool requiring validation. We conducted a comparative interventional single-center study including 25 patients with acute circulatory failure, to evaluate the agreement between CRT measured by an automated measurement device (CRT) and CRT measured clinically (CRT). CRT was measured on the fingertip, chest, and knee. Three measurements were performed at each location to obtain an average for each site. The measurements were conducted both clinically and using the DiCART™ device by two different operators, each blinded to the results. Agreement was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis. The ICC between CRT and CRT was 0.46 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.32, 0.59) across all measurement sites; the mean bias was 0.23s (95% CI -0.17, 0.64), with upper Limit of Agreement (LoA) 2.77s (95% CI 2.44, 3.20) and lower LoA - 2.30s (-2.73, -1.97). Intra observer ICC was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.91) for CRT and 0.43 (95% CI 0.15, 0.64) for CRT. Inter observer ICC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.76, 0.92) for CRT and was 0.41 (95% CI 0.14, 0,63) for CRT. The DiCART™ device showed poor agreement with clinical CRT in patients with acute circulatory failure, which does not support its use in routine practice.
毛细血管再充盈时间(CRT)是评估皮肤灌注的一项重要指标。据报道,当测量标准化时,其在急性循环衰竭患者中的预后价值会得到改善。DiCART™设备是一种需要验证的全自动CRT测量工具。我们进行了一项对比性干预单中心研究,纳入了25例急性循环衰竭患者,以评估通过自动测量设备测量的CRT(CRT)与临床测量的CRT(CRT)之间的一致性。在指尖、胸部和膝盖处测量CRT。在每个部位进行三次测量以获得每个部位的平均值。由两名不同的操作人员分别通过临床方法和使用DiCART™设备进行测量,两人均对结果不知情。使用组内相关系数(ICC)以及布兰德和奥特曼分析来确定一致性。在所有测量部位,CRT与CRT之间的ICC为0.46(95%置信区间(CI)0.32, 0.59);平均偏差为0.23秒(95% CI -0.17, 0.64),一致性界限上限(LoA)为2.77秒(95% CI 2.44, 3.20),下限LoA为 -2.30秒(-2.73, -1.97)。CRT的观察者内ICC为0.85(95% CI 0.74, 0.91),CRT的观察者内ICC为0.43(95% CI 0.15, 0.64)。CRT的观察者间ICC为0.86(95% CI 0.76, 0.92),CRT的观察者间ICC为0.41(95% CI 0.14, 0.63)。在急性循环衰竭患者中,DiCART™设备与临床CRT的一致性较差,这并不支持其在常规实践中的使用。