• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为实现更好的社会责任与正义的全球科学研究伦理之旅:文献计量分析与综述

A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review.

作者信息

Adjovi Ingrid Sonya Mawussi

机构信息

Ethics and Social Responsibility Research Unit (UR-ERS), Research Laboratory on Innovation for Agricultural Development (LRIDA), University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Feb 11;10:1504937. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1504937. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1504937
PMID:40012693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11850331/
Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance of ethical conduct in scientific research to maintain integrity, credibility, and societal relevance has been highlighted. The findings revealed a growing awareness of ethical issues, as evidenced by the development of numerous guidelines, codes of conduct, and oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including the lack of standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding of the factors contributing to unethical behavior, and unclear definitions of ethical violations. To address these issues, this study recommends promoting transparency and data sharing, enhancing education, and training programs, establishing robust mechanisms to identify and address misconduct, and encouraging collaborative research and open science practices. This study emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to restore public confidence in science, protect its positive impact, and effectively address global challenges, while upholding the principles of social responsibility and justice. This comprehensive approach is crucial for maintaining research credibility, conserving resources, and safeguarding both the research participants and the public.

摘要

本研究采用文献计量分析与系统综述相结合的方法,全面概述了科学研究中的伦理道德。强调了科学研究中道德行为对于维护诚信、可信度和社会相关性的重要性。研究结果显示,人们对伦理问题的认识不断提高,众多指导方针、行为准则和监督机构的发展就是明证。然而,重大挑战依然存在,包括缺乏检测不当行为的标准化方法、对导致不道德行为的因素理解有限以及道德违规行为的定义不明确。为解决这些问题,本研究建议提高透明度和数据共享、加强教育和培训项目、建立强有力的机制来识别和处理不当行为,以及鼓励合作研究和开放科学实践。本研究强调需要采取协作方法来恢复公众对科学的信心,保护其积极影响,并有效应对全球挑战,同时坚持社会责任和正义原则。这种全面的方法对于维护研究可信度、节约资源以及保护研究参与者和公众至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/fed5f53fdc93/frma-10-1504937-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/b5d52c6e3134/frma-10-1504937-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/7a6f76e54df1/frma-10-1504937-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/06b9c3c91873/frma-10-1504937-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/b9cd73a3334f/frma-10-1504937-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/54cb08c64e2d/frma-10-1504937-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/9e47f512572e/frma-10-1504937-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/fed5f53fdc93/frma-10-1504937-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/b5d52c6e3134/frma-10-1504937-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/7a6f76e54df1/frma-10-1504937-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/06b9c3c91873/frma-10-1504937-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/b9cd73a3334f/frma-10-1504937-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/54cb08c64e2d/frma-10-1504937-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/9e47f512572e/frma-10-1504937-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b0/11850331/fed5f53fdc93/frma-10-1504937-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review.为实现更好的社会责任与正义的全球科学研究伦理之旅:文献计量分析与综述
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Feb 11;10:1504937. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1504937. eCollection 2025.
2
A scoping review of the ethics frameworks describing issues related to the use of extended reality.一项关于描述与扩展现实使用相关问题的伦理框架的范围综述。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 10;4:74. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.17283.2. eCollection 2024.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.
5
How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community.研究人员如何看待生物医学领域的研究不端行为,以及他们如何预防研究不端行为:一个小科研社区的定性研究。
Account Res. 2018;25(4):220-238. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1463162. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
7
Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review.信息疫情管理中的伦理考量:系统范围综述。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Aug 29;4:e56307. doi: 10.2196/56307.
8
Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚利益分享在卫生研究中的概念:利益攸关方的理解——一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Oct 3;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-20.
9
The integrity of science - lost in translation?科学的诚信——在翻译中丢失了吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;28(2):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
10
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
2
Transparency in Cognitive Training Meta-analyses: A Meta-review.认知训练元分析的透明度:一项元综述。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09638-2.
3
Ethical aspects of conducting clinical trials of human medicinal products.人用药品临床试验中的伦理问题。
Ceska Slov Farm. 2023;72(6):256-266. doi: 10.5817/CSF2023-6-256.
4
Use of suboptimal control arms in randomized clinical trials of investigational cancer drugs in China, 2016-2021: An observational study.2016-2021 年中国抗肿瘤药物临床试验中对照选择欠佳的情况:一项观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Dec 12;20(12):e1004319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004319. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Knowledge of and attitudes towards medical research ethics among first year doctoral students in Slovenia at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana.斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那大学医学院一年级博士生对医学研究伦理的认知与态度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04809-w.
6
Disclosing and Managing Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Publications.科学出版物中利益冲突的披露与管理:非财务利益冲突
Res Ethics. 2023 Apr;19(2):121-138. doi: 10.1177/17470161221148387. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Research ethics: From principles to practical aspects.研究伦理:从原则到实际方面。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Sep;99(3):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
8
The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.亚洲地区学术不端和剽窃行为的文化背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 27;38(12):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e88.
9
The Effect of Mindfulness Training on the Self-Regulation of Socio-Moral Thoughts.正念训练对社会道德思想自我调节的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Dec;127(6):2898-2917. doi: 10.1177/00332941221146702. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Ethically acceptable consent approaches to adolescent research in South Africa.南非青少年研究中符合伦理的同意方式。
South Afr J HIV Med. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):1385. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v23i1.1385. eCollection 2022.