• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青年群体的社会环境、低碳认知与低碳消费行为:来自中国西藏的证据

Social environment, low-carbon cognition and low-carbon consumption behaviors of youth groups: evidence from Xizang, China.

作者信息

Ma Huifang, Chen Qin

机构信息

Politics and Public Administration College, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, China.

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;16:1494761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494761. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494761
PMID:40012945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11862823/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Global warming has profoundly transformed the natural environment and significantly impacted people's production methods, thereby promoting low-carbon consumption behaviors. While numerous scholars have examined the factors influencing low-carbon consumption behavior, their analyses predominantly rely on classical theoretical frameworks such as planned behavior theory, value-belief-norm theory and The ABC attitude theory. However, there is a notable scarcity of studies investigating the relationship between the social environment and low-carbon behaviors among youth groups. To address this gap in the literature, we aim to explore how the social environment influences youth groups' low-carbon consumption behaviors, as well as identify the mechanisms through which this influence may manifest.

METHODS

This study examines the factors influencing low-carbon consumption behavior from three perspectives: the social environment, low-carbon cognition, and conformity consumption. A theoretical model of low-carbon consumption has been developed, and data were collected through a questionnaire survey involving 600 young individuals in the Xizang Autonomous Region. The hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling techniques.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that the social environment has a significant positive impact on both low-carbon cognition and behavior. Furthermore, low-carbon cognition is shown to positively influence low-carbon behavior. In terms of the relationship between the social environment and low-carbon behavior, it is found that low-carbon cognition acts as a mediating variable. Additionally, it was observed that lower levels of conformity consumption negatively moderate both the relationship between the social environment and low-carbon behavior as well as that between low-carbon cognition and behavior.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that engaging young individuals not only fosters environmental awareness but also promotes sustainable consumption, thereby establishing a solid foundation for the protection and enhancement ofour ecological environment. Furthermore, it is essential to disseminate the concept of low-carbon consumerism through various media channels and methodologies. This approach aims to enhance young individuals' understanding of low-carbon principles, guiding them toward more scientifically informed consumption habits while reducing tendencies for blind conformity.

摘要

引言

全球变暖深刻改变了自然环境,对人们的生产方式产生了重大影响,从而推动了低碳消费行为。虽然众多学者研究了影响低碳消费行为的因素,但其分析主要依赖于计划行为理论、价值-信念-规范理论和ABC态度理论等经典理论框架。然而,研究青年群体中社会环境与低碳行为之间关系的文献明显匮乏。为了填补这一文献空白,我们旨在探讨社会环境如何影响青年群体的低碳消费行为,并确定这种影响可能显现的机制。

方法

本研究从社会环境、低碳认知和从众消费三个角度考察影响低碳消费行为的因素。构建了一个低碳消费的理论模型,并通过对西藏自治区600名年轻人的问卷调查收集数据。使用结构方程建模技术对假设关系进行检验。

结果

研究结果表明,社会环境对低碳认知和行为均有显著的正向影响。此外,低碳认知对低碳行为有正向影响。在社会环境与低碳行为的关系方面,发现低碳认知起到了中介变量的作用。此外,观察到较低水平的从众消费对社会环境与低碳行为之间的关系以及低碳认知与行为之间的关系均有负向调节作用。

讨论

这些研究结果表明,引导年轻人不仅能培养环境意识,还能促进可持续消费,从而为保护和改善我们的生态环境奠定坚实基础。此外,通过各种媒体渠道和方法传播低碳消费主义的概念至关重要。这种方法旨在增强年轻人对低碳原则的理解,引导他们养成更科学合理的消费习惯,同时减少盲目从众的倾向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/984e/11862823/a7202b5aeeae/fpsyg-16-1494761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/984e/11862823/5bee9a17f9ab/fpsyg-16-1494761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/984e/11862823/a7202b5aeeae/fpsyg-16-1494761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/984e/11862823/5bee9a17f9ab/fpsyg-16-1494761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/984e/11862823/a7202b5aeeae/fpsyg-16-1494761-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Social environment, low-carbon cognition and low-carbon consumption behaviors of youth groups: evidence from Xizang, China.青年群体的社会环境、低碳认知与低碳消费行为:来自中国西藏的证据
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;16:1494761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494761. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the impact of green consumption behavior and green purchase intention among millennials toward sustainable environment.评估千禧一代的绿色消费行为和绿色购买意向对可持续环境的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):23335-23347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23811-1. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
3
How responsible leadership shapes followers' low-carbon behavior: A dual-mediation model.负责任的领导如何塑造追随者的低碳行为:一个双重中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1086504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1086504. eCollection 2022.
4
Achievement of sustainable environment through effectiveness of social media in Z generation of China.通过社交媒体在中国 Z 世代的有效性实现可持续环境。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0292403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292403. eCollection 2023.
5
The influence of environmental cognition on green consumption behavior.环境认知对绿色消费行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27;13:988585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988585. eCollection 2022.
6
Consumers' green purchase intention to visit green hotels: A value-belief-norm theory perspective.消费者入住绿色酒店的绿色购买意愿:基于价值-信念-规范理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1139116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139116. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessing eco-label knowledge and sustainable consumption behavior in energy sector of Pakistan: an environmental sustainability paradigm.评估巴基斯坦能源部门的生态标签知识与可持续消费行为:一种环境可持续性范式。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):41319-41332. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25262-8. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Exploring the Influencing Paths of Villagers' Participation in the Creation of Micro-Landscapes: An Integrative Model of Theory of Planned Behavior and Norm Activation Theory.探索村民参与微景观创建的影响路径:计划行为理论与规范激活理论的整合模型
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:862109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862109. eCollection 2022.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Toward a knowledge economy: Factors affecting the sustainable consumption behavior in the Chinese online education industry.迈向知识经济:影响中国在线教育行业可持续消费行为的因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:1007230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007230. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual low-carbon behaviors and influencing factors: Insights from a behavior survey study in China.个体低碳行为及其影响因素:来自中国一项行为调查研究的见解
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31094. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31094. eCollection 2024 May 30.
2
Consumer motivation for organic food consumption: Health consciousness or herd mentality.消费者购买有机食品的动机:健康意识还是随大流心理。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;10:1042535. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042535. eCollection 2022.
3
The Chinese Carbon-Neutral Goal: Challenges and Prospects.
中国的碳中和目标:挑战与前景
Adv Atmos Sci. 2022;39(8):1229-1238. doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1313-6. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Young People's Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.年轻人低碳出行行为意向研究:计划行为理论的扩展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052327.
5
To conform or not to conform: spontaneous conformity diminishes the sensitivity to monetary outcomes.从众还是不从众:自发从众会降低对货币收益的敏感性。
PLoS One. 2013 May 17;8(5):e64530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064530. Print 2013.
6
Grounded cognition.具身认知
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.