Schmidt Natasha T, Janse van Rensburg Dina C, Schoeman Marlene, Besomi Manuela, Jansen van Rensburg Audrey, Garnett Daniel, Scheepers Susan, Viljoen Carel
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Sport, Exercise Medicine & Lifestyle Institute (SEMLI), University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Section Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
J Sci Med Sport. 2025 Jul;28(7):563-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
To identify and critically appraise the available evidence on injury epidemiology and risk factors in figure skating.
Systematic review.
Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to 01 November 2023. Studies were included if they reported injury epidemiology and/or injury risk factors in figure skating. Non-English publications were excluded. Risk of Bias of included studies was assessed using the QUIPS tool (quality in prognostic factor studies).
This systematic review identified twenty-nine studies (n = 4202 figure skaters), with an injury prevalence of 2.1 %-34 %. An injury incidence of 1.37 injuries/1000 total training hours was reported in one study (n = 8). Three significant intrinsic risk factors (older age, previous history of stress fracture and a higher body mass) and eight significant extrinsic risk factors (training more than 12 sessions per week, skipping meals, RED-s indicators, hamstring and quadriceps immobility, training rather than competing, increased time on-ice time and boot-foot length difference) were identified from individual studies. Age, as the most studied risk factor, requires careful interpretation due to study design limitations.
Existing data lacks quality of evidence and current reported injury risk factors in figure skating should be interpreted with caution.
High-quality research of injuries and injury risk factors in figure skating is scarce. The inconsistent reporting of injury data across the currently available literature due to variations in injury definition and data collection methods makes it difficult to compare and draw conclusions. A critical need exists for standardized research approaches to accurately determine the true burden of injury in this sport.
识别并严格评估关于花样滑冰损伤流行病学和风险因素的现有证据。
系统评价。
检索了8个电子数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年11月1日。纳入报告花样滑冰损伤流行病学和/或损伤风险因素的研究。排除非英文出版物。使用QUIPS工具(预后因素研究质量)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
本系统评价纳入了29项研究(n = 4202名花样滑冰运动员),损伤患病率为2.1% - 34%。一项研究(n = 8)报告的损伤发生率为每1000总训练小时1.37次损伤。从个别研究中确定了三个显著的内在风险因素(年龄较大、既往应力性骨折史和体重较高)和八个显著的外在风险因素(每周训练超过12节、不吃饭、相对能量缺乏综合征指标、腘绳肌和股四头肌活动受限、训练而非比赛、冰上时间增加和冰鞋与脚的长度差异)。年龄作为研究最多的风险因素,由于研究设计的局限性,需要谨慎解读。
现有数据缺乏证据质量,目前报道的花样滑冰损伤风险因素应谨慎解读。
关于花样滑冰损伤及损伤风险因素的高质量研究稀缺。由于损伤定义和数据收集方法的差异,目前现有文献中损伤数据的报告不一致,难以进行比较并得出结论。迫切需要标准化的研究方法来准确确定这项运动中损伤的真实负担。