Suppr超能文献

基于人工智能的质量改进系统对结肠镜中计算机辅助检测系统效能的影响:四组平行研究。

Effect of an artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system on efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a four-group parallel study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):757-768. doi: 10.1055/a-1706-6174. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tandem colonoscopy studies have found that about one in five adenomas are missed at colonoscopy. It remains debatable whether the combination of a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) system with a computer-aided quality improvement (CAQ) system for real-time monitoring of withdrawal speed results in additional benefits in adenoma detection or if the synergetic effect may be harmed due to excessive visual burden resulting from information overload. This study aimed to evaluate the interaction effect on improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR).

METHODS

This single-center, randomized, four-group, parallel, controlled study was performed at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Between 1 July and 15 October 2020, 1076 patients were randomly allocated into four treatment groups: control 271, CADe 268, CAQ 269, and CADe plus CAQ (COMBO) 268. The primary outcome was ADR.

RESULTS

The ADR in the control, CADe, CAQ, and COMBO groups was 14.76 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 10.54 to 18.98), 21.27 % (95 %CI 16.37 to 26.17), 24.54 % (95 %CI 19.39 to 29.68), and 30.60 % (95 %CI 25.08 to 36.11), respectively. The ADR was higher in the COMBO group compared with the CADe group (21.27 % vs. 30.6 %,  = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] 1.284, 95 %CI 1.033 to 1.596) but not compared with the CAQ group (24.54 % vs. 30.6 %,  = 0.213, OR 1.309, 95 %CI 0.857 to 2.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CAQ significantly improved the efficacy of CADe in a four-group, parallel, controlled study. No significant difference in the ADR or polyp detection rate was found between CAQ and COMBO.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查的研究发现,大约五分之一的腺瘤会被漏诊。计算机辅助息肉检测(CADe)系统与计算机辅助质量改进(CAQ)系统相结合,实时监测退镜速度是否会额外提高腺瘤检出率,或者由于信息过载导致的视觉负担过大是否会损害协同效应,这一点仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估对提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)的交互作用效果。

方法

本研究为单中心、随机、四组、平行、对照研究,在武汉大学人民医院进行。2020 年 7 月 1 日至 10 月 15 日,共纳入 1076 例患者,随机分为四组:对照组 271 例、CADe 组 268 例、CAQ 组 269 例、CADe 加 CAQ(COMBO)组 268 例。主要结局为 ADR。

结果

对照组、CADe 组、CAQ 组和 COMBO 组的 ADR 分别为 14.76%(95%可信区间[CI]:10.54%18.98%)、21.27%(95%CI:16.37%26.17%)、24.54%(95%CI:19.39%29.68%)和 30.60%(95%CI:25.08%36.11%)。COMBO 组的 ADR 高于 CADe 组(21.27%比 30.6%, = 0.024,比值比[OR]:1.284,95%CI:1.0331.596),但与 CAQ 组差异无统计学意义(24.54%比 30.6%, = 0.213,OR:1.309,95%CI:0.8572.000)。

结论

在四组平行对照研究中,CAQ 显著提高了 CADe 的疗效。CAQ 与 COMBO 组之间在 ADR 或息肉检出率方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验