• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用潜在类别分析探索瑞士队列中2型糖尿病发病率的性别差异:一种交叉性方法。

Exploring the gender difference in type 2 diabetes incidence in a Swiss cohort using latent class analysis: an intersectional approach.

作者信息

Barbier Jeanne Marie, Amiguet Michael, Vaucher Julien, Lasserre Aurélie M, Clair Carole, Schwarz Joëlle

机构信息

Department of Ambulatory Care, Unisanté, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.

Department of Medicine, Division of internal medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;2(1):e000472. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000472. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2023-000472
PMID:40018095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11812799/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes is multifactorial and influenced by the intersection of gender-related variables and other determinants of health. The aim of this study was to highlight the intersectional social position of the participants and disentangle its role from administrative sex in predicting the development of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study, a Swiss single-centre prospective cohort initiated in 2003 and including 6733 participants (age 35-75 years; 54% women) at baseline, we conducted latent class analyses using gender-related variables (eg, risk-taking behaviours, gender roles represented by employment status, etc) and socioeconomic determinants at baseline (2003-2006) to construct intersectional classes and we tested their association with the development of type 2 diabetes at follow-up (2018-2021).

RESULTS

Of the 6733 participants enrolled at baseline, 3409 were included in our analyses (50.6%). Over a median follow-up time of 14.5 years, 255 (7.5%) participants developed type 2 diabetes, of which 158 men (62.0%). We identified seven latent classes highlighting different intersectional social position groups (ie, )). Using the class labelled as 'young, fit, educated men' as reference, the risk of incident type 2 diabetes was higher in all other classes (adjusted OR values between 4.22 and 13.47). Classes mostly feminine had a more unfavourable intersectional social position than that of the predominantly masculine classes. The corresponding OR increased in sex-adjusted regressions analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We observe cumulative intersectional effects across behavioural and socioeconomic profiles with different risks of developing type 2 diabetes emphasising the deleterious effect of a feminine gender profile. These patterns are only partly captured by traditional sex-stratified analyses.

摘要

引言

2型糖尿病是多因素的,受与性别相关变量及其他健康决定因素的交叉影响。本研究的目的是突出参与者的交叉社会地位,并在预测2型糖尿病发展时将其作用与行政性别区分开来。

方法

利用CoLaus|PsyCoLaus研究,这是一项2003年启动的瑞士单中心前瞻性队列研究,基线时纳入6733名参与者(年龄35 - 75岁;54%为女性),我们使用与性别相关的变量(如冒险行为、以就业状况表示的性别角色等)和基线(2003 - 2006年)时的社会经济决定因素进行潜在类别分析,以构建交叉类别,并在随访(2018 - 2021年)时测试它们与2型糖尿病发展的关联。

结果

在基线时纳入的6733名参与者中,3409名被纳入我们的分析(50.6%)。在中位随访时间14.5年期间,255名(7.5%)参与者患2型糖尿病,其中158名男性(62.0%)。我们确定了七个潜在类别,突出了不同的交叉社会地位群体(即 )。以标记为“年轻、健康、受过教育的男性”的类别为参照,所有其他类别中2型糖尿病发病风险更高(调整后的OR值在4.22至13.47之间)。主要为女性的类别比主要为男性的类别具有更不利的交叉社会地位。在性别调整回归分析中,相应的OR增加。

结论

我们观察到行为和社会经济特征方面存在累积交叉效应,不同的2型糖尿病发病风险强调了女性性别特征的有害影响。这些模式仅部分被传统的性别分层分析所捕捉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/a03f978c61b0/bmjph-2-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/6471cc222d7e/bmjph-2-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/5222ff46eb71/bmjph-2-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/a03f978c61b0/bmjph-2-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/6471cc222d7e/bmjph-2-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/5222ff46eb71/bmjph-2-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be1/11812799/a03f978c61b0/bmjph-2-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the gender difference in type 2 diabetes incidence in a Swiss cohort using latent class analysis: an intersectional approach.采用潜在类别分析探索瑞士队列中2型糖尿病发病率的性别差异:一种交叉性方法。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;2(1):e000472. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000472. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Association of Modifiable Risk Factors in Young Adulthood With Racial Disparity in Incident Type 2 Diabetes During Middle Adulthood.青年期可改变风险因素与中年期2型糖尿病发病种族差异的关联
JAMA. 2017 Dec 26;318(24):2457-2465. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19546.
4
Intersectional analysis of social disparities in type 2 diabetes risk among adults in Germany: results from a nationwide population-based survey.德国成年人 2 型糖尿病风险的社会差异的交叉分析:一项全国性基于人群的调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17903-5.
5
Lifestyle and Psychosocial Patterns and Diabetes Incidence Among Women with and Without Obesity: a Prospective Latent Class Analysis.生活方式和心理社会模式与肥胖和非肥胖女性糖尿病发病的关系:前瞻性潜在类别分析。
Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):850-860. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01130-6.
6
Identifying the latent classes of modifiable risk behaviours among diabetic and hypertensive individuals in Northeastern India: a population-based cross-sectional study.在印度东北部,对糖尿病和高血压患者的可修正风险行为进行潜在类别分析:基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 24;12(2):e053757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053757.
7
Onset of Type 2 diabetes in adults aged 50 and older in Europe: an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.欧洲50岁及以上成年人2型糖尿病的发病情况:个体异质性和判别准确性的交叉多层次分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Nov 29;16(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01533-3.
8
Hypertension and Diabetes Status by Patterns of Stress in Older Adults From the US Health and Retirement Study: A Latent Class Analysis.美国健康与退休研究中老年人应激模式与高血压和糖尿病状况:潜类分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e024594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024594. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
Decomposing intersectional inequalities in subjective physical and mental health by sex, gendered practices and immigration status in a representative panel study from Germany.在德国一项具有代表性的面板研究中,通过性别、性别实践和移民身份分解主观身心健康的交叉不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13022-1.
10
Intersectional equity in health care: assessing complex inequities in primary and secondary care utilization by gender and education in northern Sweden.卫生保健中的交叉公平性:评估瑞典北部性别和教育在初级和二级保健利用方面的复杂不公平现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01272-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of type 2 diabetes risk factors using latent class analysis (LCA) model: a population-based study in the South of Iran, Kharameh cohort population.使用潜在类别分析(LCA)模型的2型糖尿病风险因素模式:伊朗南部哈拉梅赫队列人群的一项基于人群的研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):2473. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23576-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of sex and gender-related variables in development of metabolic syndrome: A prospective cohort study.性别和性别相关变量在代谢综合征发展中的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Mar;121:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI: What's the difference for health researchers?交叉性、健康公平和 EDI:对健康研究人员有何不同?
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 19;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01795-1.
3
Neurovascular disease in Switzerland: 10-year trends show non-traditional risk factors on the rise and higher exposure in women.
瑞士的神经血管疾病:10 年趋势显示非传统风险因素上升,女性暴露风险更高。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Sep;29(9):2851-2860. doi: 10.1111/ene.15434. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Considering sex and gender in Epidemiology: a challenge beyond terminology. From conceptual analysis to methodological strategies.考虑流行病学中的性别:超越术语的挑战。从概念分析到方法策略。
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 May 12;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00430-6.
5
Educational Attainment and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause Mortality in the US.教育程度和生活方式风险因素与美国全因死亡率的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr;3(4). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Treatment.肥胖症的患病率、合并症和治疗方面的性别差异。
Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Dec;10(4):458-466. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00453-x. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
An Update on the Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Perspective.2 型糖尿病流行病学的最新进展:全球视角。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;50(3):337-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.05.013.
8
Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods.定量研究中的交叉性:对其理论与方法的出现及应用的系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 16;14:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Identification and inclusion of gender factors in retrospective cohort studies: the GOING-FWD framework.回顾性队列研究中识别和纳入性别因素:GOING-FWD 框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005413.
10
Population segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and its clinical applications - a scoping review.2 型糖尿病患者的人群细分及其临床应用——范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01209-w.