Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Research Institute Social Cohesion (RISC), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13022-1.
The mapping of immigration-related health inequalities remains challenging, since immigrant populations constitute a heterogenous socially constructed group whose health experiences differ by social determinants of health. In spite of the increasing awareness that population mobility and its effects on health are highly gendered, an explicit gender perspective in epidemiology is often lacking or limited.
To map inequalities in self-reported physical and mental health in Germany at the intersections of sex, gendered practices and immigration status, we used data from the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP) and applied an intercategorical intersectional approach conducting multilevel linear regression models. We differentiated between sex (male/female) as reported in the survey and gendered social practices, quantified through a gender score (on a femininity-masculinity continuum).
We included 20,897 participants in our analyses. We saw an intersectional gradient for physical and mental health. Compared to the reference group, i.e. non-immigrant males with masculine gendered practices, physical and mental health steadily decreased in the intersectional groups that did not embody one or more of these social positions. The highest decreases in health were observed in the intersectional group of immigrant females with feminine gendered practices for physical health (-1,36; 95% CI [-2,09; -0,64]) and among non-immigrant females with feminine practices for mental health (-2,51; 95% CI [-3,01; -2,01]).
Patterns of physical and mental health vary along the intersectional axes of sex, gendered practices and immigration status. These findings highlight the relevance of intersections in describing population health statuses and emphasise the need to take them into account when designing public health policies aiming at effectively reducing health inequalities.
移民相关健康不平等的映射仍然具有挑战性,因为移民群体构成了一个异质的社会构建群体,其健康经历因健康的社会决定因素而异。尽管越来越意识到人口流动及其对健康的影响具有很强的性别特征,但流行病学中明确的性别观点往往缺乏或有限。
为了在性别、性别实践和移民身份的交叉点上绘制德国自我报告的身心健康不平等,我们使用了德国社会经济面板(SOEP)的数据,并应用了一种交叉分类的交叉视角方法,进行了多层次线性回归模型。我们区分了调查中报告的性别(男性/女性)和性别实践,通过性别得分(在女性气质-男性气质连续体上)进行量化。
我们在分析中纳入了 20897 名参与者。我们看到了身心健康的交叉梯度。与参考组(即具有男性化性别实践的非移民男性)相比,在没有体现这些社会地位之一或多个的交叉群体中,身心健康逐渐下降。在没有体现这些社会地位之一或多个的交叉群体中,健康状况下降幅度最大。在具有女性化性别实践的移民女性的交叉群体中,身体健康状况下降幅度最大(-1.36;95%置信区间[-2.09;-0.64]),而非移民女性中具有女性化实践的心理健康状况下降幅度最大(-2.51;95%置信区间[-3.01;-2.01])。
身心健康的模式沿着性别、性别实践和移民身份的交叉轴而变化。这些发现强调了在描述人口健康状况时交叉的相关性,并强调了在设计旨在有效减少健康不平等的公共卫生政策时需要考虑这些因素。