Suppr超能文献

一个感知权力的双因素量表。

A two-factor scale of perceived power.

作者信息

Kim Myojoong, May Frank

机构信息

Independent Researcher, Ulsan, South Korea.

Department of Marketing, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0319412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319412. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Power-the capacity to influence outcomes-manifests in two distinct forms: social power, defined as the perceived ability to control others' behaviors and decisions, and personal power, characterized by the capacity to resist unwanted external influence and maintain autonomy. Theoretically, these dimensions are rooted in different needs, and thus are likely to differentially predict certain behaviors. However, existing measures often conflate these dimensions, limiting insights into their unique behavioral effects. To address this issue, the present research has developed and validated a two-factor scale of perceived power to completely capture both facets of power across twelve studies (N =  2,878). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support the scale's structure, while reliability and validity tests demonstrate its robustness. Following assessments of the structure of the scale, its validity was demonstrated across multiple studies: Study 1 establishes the orthogonality of personal and social power through experimental manipulation, Study 2 reveals that personal power increases proactive advice-seeking, whereas social power reduces the tendency to solicit advice, and Study 3 demonstrates that social power amplifies negative reactions to service failures, while personal power does not. These divergent outcomes underscore the distinct roles of personal and social power, highlighting the scale's utility for advancing research.

摘要

权力——影响结果的能力——以两种不同形式体现:社会权力,定义为控制他人行为和决策的感知能力;个人权力,其特征是抵制不必要的外部影响并保持自主性的能力。从理论上讲,这些维度植根于不同需求,因此可能对某些行为有不同的预测作用。然而,现有的测量方法常常将这些维度混为一谈,限制了对其独特行为效应的洞察。为解决这一问题,本研究开发并验证了一个感知权力的双因素量表,通过十二项研究(N = 2878)全面涵盖权力的两个方面。探索性和验证性因素分析支持该量表的结构,而信度和效度测试证明了其稳健性。在对量表结构进行评估之后,其效度在多项研究中得到了证明:研究1通过实验操作确立了个人权力和社会权力的正交性,研究2表明个人权力会增加主动寻求建议的行为,而社会权力会降低寻求建议的倾向,研究3表明社会权力会放大对服务失败的负面反应,而个人权力则不会。这些不同的结果凸显了个人权力和社会权力的不同作用,突出了该量表对推进研究的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/11870369/a65c27c26eba/pone.0319412.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验