Baptista da Mata Diana, Coelho Sara, Vilas Boas Maria I, Silva Maria João, Marques Dânia, Ferreira Paula
Medical Oncology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, PRT.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 29;17(1):e78185. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78185. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Introduction A combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab has demonstrated a median overall survival (mOS) of 71.9 months in advanced melanoma, establishing it as the standard first-line (1L) therapy. However, the approval of this combination by the Portuguese Regulatory Authority occurred 76 months after its approval by the European Authority, leaving tyrosine kinase inhibitors as the only 1L option available for the BRAF-mutated melanoma population. Our study aims to evaluate real-world data from patients with advanced melanoma and assess the potential prognostic impact of the delayed availability of ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy on this population. Methods This was an observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Center. The study included adult patients with melanoma who received innovative therapies in the 1L between May 2016 and December 2021 and who would meet the criteria for treatment with ipilimumab/nivolumab. The primary outcome measure was mOS; secondary outcome measures included median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety data. Results Our study included 172 patients, of which 50% were male, and 32.6% (n = 56) had BRAF-mutated melanoma. In 1L setting, 70.9% received anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy, while the rest were treated with targeted therapies. The median follow-up time was 57 months. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 had ORR of 36.0%, mPFS of seven months (95% CI 2.9-11.1), and mOS of 19 months (95% CI 7.5-30.4). Among patients treated with targeted therapies, the ORR was 56.0%, mPFS seven months (95% CI 5.1-8.9), and mOS 14 months (95% CI 5.9-22.1). In our population, 10% presented grade 3 or higher adverse events, with no drug-related deaths reported. Conclusion These findings underscore significant disparities in access to innovative therapies in Portugal, which may have adversely impacted patients' outcomes. The delay raises ethical concerns regarding equity in healthcare access and highlights the need for policy measures to expedite the approval and availability of life-extending treatments.
引言 伊匹木单抗/纳武单抗联合疗法已在晚期黑色素瘤中显示出71.9个月的中位总生存期(mOS),使其成为标准的一线(1L)治疗方案。然而,葡萄牙监管机构在该联合疗法获得欧洲监管机构批准76个月后才予以批准,这使得酪氨酸激酶抑制剂成为BRAF突变黑色素瘤患者唯一可用的一线治疗选择。我们的研究旨在评估晚期黑色素瘤患者的真实世界数据,并评估伊匹木单抗/纳武单抗联合疗法延迟可用对该人群的潜在预后影响。
方法 这是一项在葡萄牙综合癌症中心进行的观察性、回顾性队列研究。该研究纳入了2016年5月至2021年12月期间接受一线创新疗法且符合伊匹木单抗/纳武单抗治疗标准的成年黑色素瘤患者。主要结局指标是mOS;次要结局指标包括中位无进展生存期(mPFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和安全性数据。
结果 我们的研究纳入了172例患者,其中50%为男性,32.6%(n = 56)患有BRAF突变黑色素瘤。在一线治疗中,70.9%的患者接受抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(抗PD-1)单药治疗,其余患者接受靶向治疗。中位随访时间为57个月。接受抗PD-1治疗的患者的ORR为36.0%,mPFS为7个月(95%CI 2.9 - 11.1),mOS为19个月(95%CI 7.5 - 30.4)。在接受靶向治疗的患者中,ORR为56.0%,mPFS为7个月(95%CI 5.1 - 8.9),mOS为14个月(95%CI 5.9 - 22.1)。在我们的研究人群中,10%的患者出现3级或更高等级的不良事件,未报告与药物相关的死亡。
结论 这些发现强调了葡萄牙在获得创新疗法方面存在显著差异,这可能对患者的预后产生不利影响。这种延迟引发了关于医疗保健公平性的伦理问题,并凸显了采取政策措施加快延长生命治疗的批准和可用性的必要性。