Suppr超能文献

ADC直方图分析预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤术后复发的可行性

Feasibility of ADC histogram analysis for predicting of postoperative recurrence in aggressive spinal tumors.

作者信息

Wang Qizheng, Chen Yongye, Zhou Guangjin, Wang Tongyu, Fang Jingchao, Liu Ke, Qin Siyuan, Zhao Weili, Hao Dapeng, Lang Ning

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District 100069 Beijing, PR China.

Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao 266000 Shandong, PR China.

出版信息

J Bone Oncol. 2025 Feb 11;51:100666. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100666. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification of spinal tumors is a major unmet clinical need for personalized therapy.

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of pretreatment whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in predicting local recurrence of aggressive spinal tumors.

METHODS

119 aggressive spinal tumor patients (median age, 40; range, 13-74  years) confirmed by pathological findings with a mean follow-up of 36 months were enrolled and divided into the recurrence and non-recurrence group. The histogram metrics of whole-lesion, including the maximum, mean, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, and percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th) ADC values, were evaluated and take the average. Fractal dimension (FD) was assessed in the three orthogonal directions and take maximum. Clinical and general imaging features were used to construct an alternative prognostic model for comparison. Variables with statistical differences would be included in stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

As for the clinical model, Enneking staging (odds ratio [OR]: 3.572;  = 0.04) and vertebral compression (OR: 4.302;  = 0.002) were independent predictors of recurrence. There was no statistical difference in FD between the two groups ( = 0.623). Among the ADC histogram parameters compared, skewness, maximum, and mean ADC values were independent risk factors and constructed ADC histogram prediction models. The ADC histogram model (AUC = 0.871) and the combined model (AUC = 0.884) performed better than the clinical prediction model (AUC = 0.704) with -values of 0.004 and 0.001, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prediction models based on the ADC histogram analysis might represent serviceable instruments for the aggressive spinal tumors.

摘要

背景

脊柱肿瘤的风险分层是个性化治疗中一项尚未满足的主要临床需求。

目的

探讨治疗前全瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤局部复发的可行性。

方法

纳入119例经病理证实的侵袭性脊柱肿瘤患者(中位年龄40岁;范围13 - 74岁),平均随访36个月,分为复发组和非复发组。评估全瘤的直方图指标,包括最大、平均、峰度、偏度、熵以及百分位数(第10、25、50、75、95)ADC值,并取平均值。在三个正交方向评估分形维数(FD)并取最大值。使用临床和常规影像特征构建替代预后模型进行比较。具有统计学差异的变量将纳入逐步逻辑回归分析。

结果

对于临床模型,Enneking分期(比值比[OR]:3.572;P = 0.04)和椎体压缩(OR:4.302;P = 0.002)是复发的独立预测因素。两组间FD无统计学差异(P = 0.623)。在比较的ADC直方图参数中,偏度、最大和平均ADC值是独立危险因素,并构建了ADC直方图预测模型。ADC直方图模型(AUC = 0.871)和联合模型(AUC = 0.884)的表现优于临床预测模型(AUC = 0.704),P值分别为0.004和0.001。

结论

基于ADC直方图分析的预测模型可能是侵袭性脊柱肿瘤有用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e66/11871475/f070968500e8/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验