• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症中的语言偏差:频率分析

Language deviations in aphasia: a frequency analysis.

作者信息

Ardila A, Rosselli M

机构信息

Instituto Colombiano de Neuropsicología.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1993 Feb;44(2):165-80. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1011.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1993.1011
PMID:8428310
Abstract

Thirty right-handed left hemisphere-damaged patients were taken and divided into five groups (transcortical motor, Broca, conduction, Wernicke, and anomic aphasia). Language deviations were scored and analyzed for the Picture Description (Plate No. 1, The Cookie Theft), Repetition (Words, High and Low Probability Sentences), and Naming (Responsive Naming, Confrontation, and Body-part naming) subtests of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination--Spanish version (Goodglass & Kaplan, 1979). A classification of paraphasias is proposed. Language deviations were scores for the following groups: Literal paraphasias (phoneme omissions, additions, displacements, and substitutions), verbal paraphasias (formal, morphologic, semantic, and unrelated), syntagmatic paraphasias, circumlocutions (object description and instrumental function), indefinite anaphors, and neologisms. Frequency of different types of language deviations is presented in the five aphasia groups. It was found that some paraphasic errors appeared in several aphasia groups; others were characteristics of specific aphasic syndromes.

摘要

选取了30名右利手且左半球受损的患者,并将其分为五组(经皮质运动性失语、布罗卡失语、传导性失语、韦尼克失语和命名性失语)。对波士顿诊断性失语症检查西班牙语版(Goodglass & Kaplan,1979)的图片描述(第1号图板,“偷饼干”)、复述(单词、高概率和低概率句子)以及命名(应答性命名、对答命名和身体部位命名)子测试中的语言偏差进行评分和分析。提出了一种错语分类方法。对以下几组的语言偏差进行了评分:字面错语(音素省略、添加、移位和替换)、言语错语(形式、形态、语义和无关错语)、组合性错语、迂回表达(物体描述和工具功能)、不定指代词和新语。呈现了五个失语症组中不同类型语言偏差的频率。研究发现,一些错语错误出现在几个失语症组中;其他一些则是特定失语症综合征的特征。

相似文献

1
Language deviations in aphasia: a frequency analysis.失语症中的语言偏差:频率分析
Brain Lang. 1993 Feb;44(2):165-80. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1011.
2
[Language and cognitive impairment: a semiological study into visual naming].[语言与认知障碍:视觉命名的症状学研究]
Rev Neurol. 2006;42(10):578-83.
3
What is semantic dementia?: a cohort study of diagnostic features and clinical boundaries.什么是语义性痴呆?:一项关于诊断特征和临床界限的队列研究。
Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):483-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.55.
4
[Acoustic and semantic disturbances of comprehension in aphasia].[失语症中听觉和语义理解障碍]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1975 Sep;131(9):645-59.
5
Connectionist approaches to understanding aphasic perseveration.理解失语性持续症的联结主义方法。
Semin Speech Lang. 2004 Nov;25(4):323-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-837245.
6
Confrontation naming in individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantitative analysis of paraphasic error subtypes.颞叶癫痫患者的对指命名:错语错误亚型的定量分析
Neuropsychology. 2005 Sep;19(5):603-11. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.603.
7
[Variability in the semantic errors produced by brain-injured patients].[脑损伤患者产生的语义错误的变异性]
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):795-800.
8
Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: a single-case approach.保留对习语意义和字面意义的理解:一种单病例研究方法。
Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):207-15. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00384-5.
9
Crossed aphasia in a dextral: a test of the Alexander-Annett theory of anomalous organization of brain function.右利手者的交叉性失语:对亚历山大 - 安妮特脑功能异常组织理论的一项检验
Brain Lang. 1998 Jul;63(3):426-38. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1962.
10
Characteristics of verbal semantic impairment in left hemisphere epilepsy.左侧半球癫痫患者言语语义损害的特征
Neuropsychology. 2005 Jul;19(4):501-8. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.501.

引用本文的文献

1
Normative Data for the Adult Turkish Population and Validation Study in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease of the TDQ-30 Tr, a Color Picture-naming Test for Adults and the Elderly.成人土耳其人群的常模数据以及成人及老年人彩色图片命名测试TDQ - 30 Tr在轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的效度研究。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70718. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70718.
2
Semantic flow and its relation to controlled semantic retrieval deficits in the narrative production of people with aphasia.语义流及其与失语症患者叙事产生中受控语义检索缺陷的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jun 6;170:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108235. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Word Error Analysis in Aphasia: Introducing the Greek Aphasia Error Corpus (GRAEC).
失语症中的单词错误分析:引入希腊失语症错误语料库(GRAEC)。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 4;11:1577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01577. eCollection 2020.
4
Neuroanatomical correlates of phonologic errors in logopenic progressive aphasia.失语型进行性失语症中语音错误的神经解剖学相关性。
Brain Lang. 2020 May;204:104773. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104773. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Describing Phonological Paraphasias in Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia.描述三种原发性进行性失语症变体中的语音类错语。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):336-349. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0210.
6
Language and visual perception associations: meta-analytic connectivity modeling of Brodmann area 37.语言与视觉感知关联:布罗德曼37区的元分析连接建模
Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:565871. doi: 10.1155/2015/565871. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming.名称一致性对公开和隐蔽图片命名过程中前额叶活动的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Mar;4(1):43-57. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.1.43.
8
Spanish applications of Luria's assessment methods.卢里亚评估方法在西班牙的应用。
Neuropsychol Rev. 1999 Jun;9(2):63-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1025603723025.
9
Phonological transformations in conduction aphasia.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1992 Nov;21(6):473-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01067525.