文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians.

作者信息

Forster Felix, Riesmeyer Claudia, Ermel Lyn, Lüthy Katharina, Jung Ronny, Weinmann Tobias

机构信息

Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 5, 80336, München, Germany.

Department of Media and Communication, LMU Munich, Oettingenstr. 67, 80538, München, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 3;26(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9.


DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9
PMID:40033214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11874860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is little evidence for adverse health effects due to exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) below legal limits, worries regarding these effects are relatively frequent in the general population. For many individuals, general practitioners (GPs) and pediatricians are the first point of contact with the health system. Therefore, it is essential to understand their EMF risk perception. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study inviting 3,000 GPs and 2,000 pediatricians sampled from the German Federal Medical Registry, of which 614 (12.3%) participated in an online survey and 25 participated in focus groups. We estimated the prevalence of high risk perception, poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF, and the relevance of EMF in their everyday work correcting for non-response by Multilevel Regression and Poststratification. RESULTS: About a quarter of physicians indicated high risk perception regarding health and EMF. Relevance was low, with about 40% of GPs and about 20% of pediatricians reporting EMF-related consultations during the last year. About 60% of physicians had poor subjective knowledge. Many physicians said they could not rule out the possibility of adverse health effects of EMF due to insufficient knowledge and expressed a need for information to address this knowledge gap. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial part of GPs and pediatricians with high risk perception are physicians with poor subjective knowledge regarding EMF who cannot completely rule out EMF below legal limits as a cause of unspecific, unclear symptoms, and who are therefore open to patients' suggestions of EMF as a potential cause.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians.

BMC Prim Care. 2025-3-3

[2]
General practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine differ from general practitioners using conventional medicine in their view of the risks of electromagnetic fields: a postal survey from Germany.

J Prim Care Community Health. 2015-1

[3]
German wide cross sectional survey on health impacts of electromagnetic fields in the view of general practitioners.

Int J Public Health. 2009-12-18

[4]
General practitioners' knowledge and concern about electromagnetic fields.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014-12-12

[5]
Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields--a survey among general practitioners.

BMC Public Health. 2006-10-30

[6]
[French general practitioners and electromagnetic fields].

Presse Med. 2013-5

[7]
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in occupational and primary health care: A nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians and hygienists in the Netherlands.

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017-4

[8]
Acceptance of universal varicella vaccination among Swiss pediatricians and general practitioners who treat pediatric patients.

BMC Infect Dis. 2021-1-6

[9]
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010-11-19

[10]
Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general population.

Perspect Public Health. 2014-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
The effect of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human resting state wake EEG and event-related potential: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2025-1

[2]
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cognitive performance in human experimental studies: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Environ Int. 2024-9

[3]
The effects of radiofrequency exposure on cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human observational studies.

Environ Int. 2024-6

[4]
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: A systematic review and meta-analysis on human observational studies.

Environ Int. 2024-1

[5]
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.

J Stat Softw. 2017

[6]
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.

Environ Int. 2022-2

[7]
Trends in participation rates in case-control studies of occupational risk factors 1991-2017.

Occup Environ Med. 2020-7-9

[8]
Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).

Health Phys. 2020-5

[9]
Effects of RF-EMF on the Human Resting-State EEG-the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non-Exposure-Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2019-7

[10]
[Controversies around electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The construction of "low noise" public problems].

Sante Publique. 2019

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索