Danker-Hopfe Heidi, Eggert Torsten, Dorn Hans, Sauter Cornelia
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2019 Jul;40(5):291-318. doi: 10.1002/bem.22194. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha-frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone-related EMF sources were observed, whereas other studies did not report any effects. In this review, possible reasons for these inconsistencies are presented and recommendations for future waking EEG studies are made. The physiological basis of underlying brain activity, and the technical requirements and framework conditions for conducting and analyzing the human resting-state EEG are discussed. Peer-reviewed articles on possible effects of EMF on waking EEG were evaluated with regard to non-exposure-related confounding factors. Recommendations derived from international guidelines on the analysis and reporting of findings are proposed to achieve comparability in future studies. In total, 22 peer-reviewed studies on possible RF-EMF effects on human resting-state EEG were analyzed. EEG power in the alpha frequency range was reported to be increased in 10, decreased in four, and not affected in eight studies. All reviewed studies differ in several ways in terms of the methodologies applied, which might contribute to different results and conclusions about the impact of EMF on human resting-state EEG. A discussion of various study protocols and different outcome parameters prevents a scientifically sound statement on the impact of RF-EMF on human brain activity in resting-state EEG. Further studies which apply comparable, standardized study protocols are recommended. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:291-318. © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
关于射频电磁场(RF - EMF)对人类清醒脑电图(EEG)可能产生的影响的研究结果差异很大。在大多数研究中,观察到暴露于与手机相关的电磁场源不同信号的受试者的α频率范围内有变化,而其他研究则未报告任何影响。在本综述中,阐述了这些不一致的可能原因,并对未来的清醒脑电图研究提出了建议。讨论了潜在大脑活动的生理基础以及进行和分析人类静息态脑电图的技术要求和框架条件。对关于电磁场对清醒脑电图可能影响的同行评审文章,就与非暴露相关的混杂因素进行了评估。提出了从国际关于研究结果分析和报告的指南中得出的建议,以在未来研究中实现可比性。总共分析了22项关于射频电磁场对人类静息态脑电图可能影响的同行评审研究。据报告,在10项研究中α频率范围内的脑电图功率增加,在4项研究中降低,在8项研究中未受影响。所有综述研究在应用的方法学方面在几个方面存在差异,这可能导致关于电磁场对人类静息态脑电图影响的不同结果和结论。对各种研究方案和不同结果参数的讨论妨碍了就射频电磁场对静息态脑电图中人类大脑活动的影响做出科学合理的陈述。建议进一步开展采用可比的、标准化研究方案的研究。《生物电磁学》。2019年;40:291 - 318。© 2019作者。《生物电磁学》由威利期刊公司出版。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2023
Int J Radiat Biol. 2021
Bioelectromagnetics. 2017-7
Bioelectromagnetics. 2016-9
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-9-21
Int J Epidemiol. 2017-4-1
Neuropsychobiology. 2015
PLoS One. 2015-6-8
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016-1
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015-2-4