• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生对电磁场的了解与关注。

General practitioners' knowledge and concern about electromagnetic fields.

作者信息

Berg-Beckhoff Gabriele, Breckenkamp Jürgen, Larsen Pia Veldt, Kowall Bernd

机构信息

Unit of Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg 6700, Denmark.

Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;11(12):12969-82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212969. Print 2014 Dec.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph111212969
PMID:25514150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4276656/
Abstract

Our aim is to explore general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge about EMF, and to assess whether different knowledge structures are related to the GPs' concern about EMF. Random samples were drawn from lists of GPs in Germany in 2008. Knowledge about EMF was assessed by seven items. A latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent structures in GPs' knowledge. Further, the GPs' concern about EMF health risk was measured using a score comprising six items. The association between GPs' concern about EMF and their knowledge was analysed using multiple linear regression. In total 435 (response rate 23.3%) GPs participated in the study. Four groups were identified by the latent class analysis: 43.1% of the GPs gave mainly correct answers; 23.7% of the GPs answered low frequency EMF questions correctly; 19.2% answered only the questions relating EMF with health risks, and 14.0% answered mostly "don't know". There was no association between GPs' latent knowledge classes or between the number of correct answers given by the GPs and their EMF concern, whereas the number of incorrect answers was associated with EMF concern. Greater EMF concern in subjects with more incorrect answers suggests paying particular attention to misconceptions regarding EMF in risk communication.

摘要

我们的目的是探究全科医生(GPs)关于电磁场(EMF)的知识,并评估不同的知识结构是否与全科医生对电磁场的担忧相关。2008年从德国全科医生名单中抽取随机样本。通过七个项目评估关于电磁场的知识。进行潜在类别分析以识别全科医生知识中的潜在结构。此外,使用包含六个项目的分数来衡量全科医生对电磁场健康风险的担忧。使用多元线性回归分析全科医生对电磁场的担忧与其知识之间的关联。共有435名全科医生(回复率23.3%)参与了该研究。潜在类别分析确定了四组:43.1%的全科医生给出的主要是正确答案;23.7%的全科医生正确回答了低频电磁场问题;19.2%的全科医生仅回答了与电磁场健康风险相关的问题,14.0%的全科医生大多回答“不知道”。全科医生的潜在知识类别之间,或全科医生给出的正确答案数量与其对电磁场的担忧之间没有关联,而错误答案的数量与对电磁场的担忧相关。错误答案较多的受试者对电磁场的担忧更大,这表明在风险沟通中应特别关注关于电磁场的误解。

相似文献

1
General practitioners' knowledge and concern about electromagnetic fields.全科医生对电磁场的了解与关注。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;11(12):12969-82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212969. Print 2014 Dec.
2
General practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine differ from general practitioners using conventional medicine in their view of the risks of electromagnetic fields: a postal survey from Germany.德国一项邮寄调查显示:使用补充替代医学的全科医生与使用传统医学的全科医生对电磁场风险的看法存在差异。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2015 Jan;6(1):21-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131914546332. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
German wide cross sectional survey on health impacts of electromagnetic fields in the view of general practitioners.德国全科医生视角下的电磁场健康影响的横断面调查。
Int J Public Health. 2010 Oct;55(5):507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-0110-2. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
4
Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields--a survey among general practitioners.针对归因于电磁场的症状在基层医疗中的会诊——全科医生调查
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 30;6:267. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-267.
5
[French general practitioners and electromagnetic fields].[法国全科医生与电磁场]
Presse Med. 2013 May;42(5):e133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.09.026. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
6
What influences general practitioners' use of exercise for patients with chronic knee pain? Results from a national survey.什么因素影响全科医生对慢性膝关节疼痛患者采用运动疗法?一项全国性调查的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Dec 19;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0570-4.
7
Unexplained variations in general practitioners' perceptions and practices regarding vaccination in France.法国全科医生对疫苗接种的认知和实践存在不明差异。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):2-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky146.
8
General practitioners' predictions of their own patients' health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium.全科医生对其自身患者健康素养的预测:比利时的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029357.
9
GPs' views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study.全科医生对使用抑郁筛查和以全科医生为目标的反馈的看法:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3279-3286. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
10
Norwegian general practitioners' knowledge and beliefs about breastfeeding, and their self-rated ability as breastfeeding counsellor.挪威全科医生关于母乳喂养的知识和信念,以及他们对自身作为母乳喂养顾问能力的自我评估。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;34(2):122-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2016.1160632. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of website-based risk communication of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on general public.基于网站的射频电磁场风险沟通对公众的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1438986. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438986. eCollection 2024.
2
Phthalate Exposure in Pregnant Women: Risk Perception and Preventive Advice of Perinatal Health Professionals.孕妇邻苯二甲酸盐暴露:围产期健康专业人员的风险认知与预防建议
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Mar;23(3):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2668-x.
3
Effects of single and combined low frequency electromagnetic fields and simulated microgravity on gene expression of human mesenchymal stem cells during chondrogenesis.低频电磁场及模拟微重力单独及联合作用对人骨髓间充质干细胞软骨分化过程中基因表达的影响
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Apr;14(3):608-616. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59894. Epub 2016 May 16.
4
Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals.法国围产期健康专业人员对环境风险的认知及健康促进态度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 18;13(12):1255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121255.

本文引用的文献

1
General practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine differ from general practitioners using conventional medicine in their view of the risks of electromagnetic fields: a postal survey from Germany.德国一项邮寄调查显示:使用补充替代医学的全科医生与使用传统医学的全科医生对电磁场风险的看法存在差异。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2015 Jan;6(1):21-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131914546332. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
2
Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior.比较环境敏感患者的非特异性躯体症状:患病率、持续时间、功能状态和患病行为。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 May;76(5):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
3
[Complementary and alternative medicine in the German outpatient setting: extent, structure and reasons for provision].[德国门诊环境中的补充和替代医学:提供情况、结构及原因]
Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Nov;76(11):715-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364013. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
4
Heat waves and climate change: applying the health belief model to identify predictors of risk perception and adaptive behaviours in adelaide, australia.热浪和气候变化:应用健康信念模型识别澳大利亚阿德莱德风险感知和适应行为的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 May 29;10(6):2164-84. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10062164.
5
Republished review: systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields.再刊评论:手机电磁场的精神运动效应的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;87(1031):643-51. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.047027rep.
6
Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.射频电磁场的致癌性。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):624-6. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70147-4.
7
Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields: critical evaluation of behavioral and neurophysiological studies.手机电磁场的影响:行为和神经生理学研究的批判性评估
Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 May;32(4):253-72. doi: 10.1002/bem.20635. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
8
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields.基层医疗医生对电磁场健康风险的看法。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Nov;107(46):817-23. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
9
Cell phones and health concerns: impact of knowledge and voluntary precautionary recommendations.手机与健康问题:知识和自愿预防建议的影响。
Risk Anal. 2011 Feb;31(2):301-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01498.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
10
Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods.个人接触射频电磁场(RF-EMF)的分类:不同暴露评估方法的评估。
Environ Int. 2010 Oct;36(7):714-20. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 9.