Luo Yuanyuan, Zhang Hong, Wu Qiang, Li Qianlong, Ye Zhihua, Zeng Jixiao, Xu Xiaogang
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 17;13:1537897. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1537897. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to investigate the factors associated with unplanned re-operations (UR) following transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSILA) in pediatric patients.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from children diagnosed with acute appendicitis (AA) who underwent TUSILA at our center between January 2020 and January 2024. All the operations were performed under single-port laparoscopy, including two methods of appendectomy, intra-TUSILA and extra-TUSILA. Patients were categorized into the UR and control groups to compare baseline characteristics, clinical data, postoperative management, and surgical outcomes.
The study included 188 patients (110 males and 78 females), with 4 (2.1%) in the UR group. Within the UR group, three cases (75%) necessitated re-operation due to adhesive intestinal obstruction, while one case (25%) was due to an appendiceal remnant fistula. The baseline characteristics, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, surgeon experience, and postoperative fasting times showed no significant difference between the two groups (all > 0.05). However, the incidences of procedures beyond standard TUSILA, lateral peritoneum lysis, appendiceal perforation, complicated appendicitis as confirmed by pathology, drainage tube placement, and the length of antibiotic duration were significantly higher in the UR group compared to the control group (all < 0.05).
A notable percentage of pediatric patients undergoing TUSILA experience UR, primarily due to adhesive ileus, with a substantial proportion potentially linked to surgical technical errors and postoperative management.
本研究旨在探讨小儿经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TUSILA)后计划外再次手术(UR)的相关因素。
我们对2020年1月至2024年1月在本中心接受TUSILA的急性阑尾炎(AA)患儿的临床资料进行了回顾性分析。所有手术均在单孔腹腔镜下进行,包括两种阑尾切除方法,即TUSILA内法和TUSILA外法。将患者分为UR组和对照组,比较基线特征、临床资料、术后管理和手术结局。
该研究纳入了188例患者(男110例,女78例),UR组有4例(2.1%)。在UR组中,3例(75%)因粘连性肠梗阻需要再次手术,1例(25%)因阑尾残端瘘需要再次手术。两组的基线特征、手术时间、术中出血量、外科医生经验和术后禁食时间均无显著差异(均P>0.05)。然而,与对照组相比,UR组中超出标准TUSILA的手术、侧腹膜松解、阑尾穿孔、病理证实的复杂性阑尾炎、引流管放置以及抗生素使用时间的发生率显著更高(均P<0.05)。
接受TUSILA的小儿患者中有相当比例经历UR,主要原因是粘连性肠梗阻,很大一部分可能与手术技术失误和术后管理有关。