• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术是初学者安全可行的术式:1948 例经验总结。

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, #665, Bupyung-6-dong, Bupyunggu, 403-720, Incheon, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2997-3002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9
PMID:32548655
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has recently become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and surgical outcomes of SIL-A by residents and surgeons during the learning period.

METHODS

A total of 1948 consecutive patients who underwent SIL-A from May 2008 to November 2014 were studied retrospectively. Surgeries were performed by residents and eight surgeons. Prior to the first case, surgeons and residents had been trained in a training protocol during the learning period. Three initial cases of SIL-A were performed under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (learning period, n = 483), the first 40 cases by each surgeon and resident; and group 2 (experienced period, n = 1465), cases after the 40th procedure performed by each surgeon. Surgical results were compared between the two groups by performing propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in patient demographics and characteristics of appendicitis between the two groups. The operating time was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (45.3 ± 18.0 vs. 33.9 ± 16.1 min, p < 0.001). The morbidity rate (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.795) was similar between the two groups. Readmission rate (2.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.414) and reoperation rate (0.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.348) were also similar between the two groups. However, the rate of incisional hernia occurrence (0.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.066) tended to be larger in group 1 than in group 2 without showing a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

SIL-A is a technically feasible and safe procedure when it is performed by residents and surgeons during learning period under an appropriate training protocol. However, residents and surgeons in the learning period should perform it carefully to prevent incisional hernias.

摘要

背景

单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SIL-A)最近已成为治疗阑尾炎的一种选择。本研究旨在评估住院医师和外科医师在学习期间实施 SIL-A 的安全性、可行性和手术结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年 5 月至 2014 年 11 月期间行 SIL-A 的 1948 例连续患者。手术由住院医师和 8 位外科医师完成。在首例手术前,外科医师和住院医师已在学习期间按照培训方案进行了培训。前 3 例 SIL-A 手术在有经验的外科医师的监督下进行。患者分为两组:第 1 组(学习期,n=483),每位外科医师和住院医师的前 40 例;第 2 组(经验期,n=1465),每位外科医师的第 40 例以后的病例。通过倾向评分匹配分析比较两组患者的手术结果。

结果

经倾向评分匹配后,两组患者的人口统计学特征和阑尾炎特征无显著差异。第 1 组的手术时间长于第 2 组(45.3±18.0 分钟比 33.9±16.1 分钟,p<0.001)。两组的发病率(7.0%比 6.5%,p=0.795)相似。两组的再入院率(2.1%比 1.3%,p=0.414)和再次手术率(0.8%比 0.8%,p=0.348)也相似。然而,第 1 组切口疝发生率(0.6%比 0%,p=0.066)高于第 2 组,但无统计学差异。

结论

在适当的培训方案下,住院医师和外科医师在学习期间实施 SIL-A 技术上是可行且安全的。然而,学习期间的住院医师和外科医师应谨慎操作,以防止切口疝的发生。

相似文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术是初学者安全可行的术式:1948 例经验总结。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2997-3002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
2
Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001064.
3
Adopting Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Is It Safe During the Learning Curve?儿童单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的应用:在学习曲线阶段是否安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Oct;29(10):1306-1310. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0112. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Evaluating the Feasibility of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by a Resident Based on Propensity Score Matching.基于倾向得分匹配评估住院医师实施单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):1031-1037. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0016. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.单孔腹腔镜手术作为一种教学术式:单中心超2100例手术的经验
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——高级实习医生在无监督情况下手术与经验丰富的儿科外科医生手术的结果对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents is safe and feasible.住院医师实施的经脐腹腔镜阑尾切除术是安全可行的。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 Nov;9(4):270-274. doi: 10.1111/ases.12303. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单机构的结局分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):626-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3219-6. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
Teaching single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients.在儿科患者中教授单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):619-22. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882737339.
10
Impact of Resident-Performed Laparoscopic Appendectomy on Patient Outcomes and Safety.住院医师实施的腹腔镜阑尾切除术对患者预后和安全性的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-46. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0357. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world data of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a German-wide prospective cohort study among 276 individuals.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的真实世界数据:一项针对276名个体的全德前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 10;87(8):4758-4764. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003478. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Risk factors and incidence of unplanned re-operation after transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic appendectomy in children.儿童经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术后计划外再次手术的危险因素及发生率
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 17;13:1537897. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1537897. eCollection 2025.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——高级实习医生在无监督情况下手术与经验丰富的儿科外科医生手术的结果对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
2
Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents.老年普通外科医师与普通外科住院医师行阑尾切除术的结局比较。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):679-685. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0578.
3
Can laparoscopic appendectomy be safely performed by surgical residents without prior experience of open appendectomy?
单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统方法的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1667-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10659-w. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
4
A brief overview of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an optimal surgical procedure for patients with acute appendicitis: still a long way to go.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为急性阑尾炎患者的最佳手术方式的简要概述:仍有很长的路要走。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Jul;51(7):3000605231183781. doi: 10.1177/03000605231183781.
5
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.
6
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study.经脐单孔与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的单中心回顾性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Aug;50(8):3000605221119647. doi: 10.1177/03000605221119647.
7
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.经脐部切口使用手术手套端口行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 26;14(4):e24512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24512. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与三孔阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎术后采用加速康复外科方案的术后结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
没有开腹阑尾切除术经验的外科住院医师是否可以安全地进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术?
Asian J Surg. 2018 May;41(3):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.087. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
5
Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay.住院医师参与腹腔镜手术不会使临床结果恶化,但可能会增加手术时间和住院时间。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3783-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4674-z. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001064.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单机构的结局分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):626-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3219-6. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
8
Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomies: a meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 7;19(25):4072-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.4072.
9
Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.随机前瞻性研究比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与脐部单切口阑尾切除术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):413-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318278d225.
10
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.