Department of General Surgery, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang, Liaoning, China.
Department of Oncology, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang, Liaoning, China.
J Int Med Res. 2022 Aug;50(8):3000605221119647. doi: 10.1177/03000605221119647.
To compare the clinical outcomes between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle-type grasping forceps (SLAN) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.
We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis who underwent SLAN or CLA from May 2019 to May 2021 in our center. The patients' baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. Additionally, baseline characteristics were compared with postoperative outcomes in the SLAN group.
Ninety-six patients were enrolled (SLAN group, n = 32; CLA group, n = 64). The SLAN group had a shorter hospital stay, lower 24-hour postoperative visual analogue scale scores, shorter postoperative fasting time, lower frequency of antibiotic administration, and longer operative time than the CLA group. In the SLAN group, younger patients had a longer appendix and male patients had a thicker appendix; additionally, patients with an appendiceal diameter of 0.6 to 1.0 cm had a longer postoperative hospital stay and higher frequency of antibiotic administration.
Compared with CLA, SLAN may be less invasive, provide faster postoperative recovery, and result in better cosmesis for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Further research should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcomes.
比较单孔腹腔镜抓钳辅助阑尾切除术(SLAN)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)治疗单纯性阑尾炎的临床疗效。
回顾性收集 2019 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月我院收治的单纯性阑尾炎患者行 SLAN 或 CLA 的临床资料。比较两组患者的一般资料、围手术期指标及随访情况。另外,比较 SLAN 组患者的基线资料与术后结果。
共纳入 96 例患者(SLAN 组 32 例,CLA 组 64 例)。SLAN 组患者的住院时间更短,术后 24 小时视觉模拟评分更低,术后禁食时间更短,抗生素使用频率更低,手术时间更长。在 SLAN 组中,年轻患者的阑尾更长,男性患者的阑尾更厚;此外,阑尾直径为 0.6~1.0 cm 的患者术后住院时间更长,抗生素使用频率更高。
与 CLA 相比,SLAN 治疗单纯性阑尾炎可能具有创伤更小、术后恢复更快、美容效果更好的优点。需要进一步研究来评估其长期疗效。