Huang Rukuang, Gohil Chetan, Woolrich Mark
Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Mar;46(4):e70179. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70179.
There is growing interest in studying the temporal structure in brain network activity, in particular, dynamic functional connectivity (FC), which has been linked in several studies with cognition, demographics and disease states. The sliding window approach is one of the most common approaches to compute dynamic FC. However, it cannot detect cognitively relevant and transient temporal changes at time scales of fast cognition, that is, on the order of 100 ms, which can be identified with model-based methods such as the HMM (Hidden Markov Model) and DyNeMo (Dynamic Network Modes) using electrophysiology. These new methods provide time-varying estimates of the 'power' (i.e., variance) and of the functional connectivity of the brain activity, under the assumption that they share the same dynamics. But there is no principled basis for this assumption. Using a new method that allows for the possibility that power and FC networks have different dynamics (Multi-dynamic DyNeMo) on resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, we show that the dynamics of the power and the FC networks are not coupled. Using a (visual) task MEG dataset, we show that the power and FC network dynamics are modulated by the task, such that the coupling in their dynamics changes significantly during the task. This work reveals novel insights into evoked network responses and ongoing activity that previous methods fail to capture, challenging the assumption that power and FC share the same dynamics.
对研究脑网络活动的时间结构,尤其是动态功能连接(FC)的兴趣日益浓厚,在多项研究中,动态功能连接已与认知、人口统计学和疾病状态联系起来。滑动窗口方法是计算动态FC最常用的方法之一。然而,它无法检测快速认知时间尺度上(即100毫秒左右)与认知相关的瞬态时间变化,而基于模型的方法(如使用电生理学的隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)和动态网络模式(DyNeMo))可以识别这些变化。这些新方法在假设大脑活动的“功率”(即方差)和功能连接具有相同动态的情况下,提供了随时间变化的估计。但这一假设没有原则依据。使用一种新方法,该方法考虑了功率网络和FC网络可能具有不同动态的可能性(多动态DyNeMo),对静息态脑磁图(MEG)数据进行分析,我们发现功率网络和FC网络的动态并非耦合的。使用一个(视觉)任务MEG数据集,我们表明功率网络和FC网络的动态受到任务的调制,使得它们在任务期间动态耦合发生显著变化。这项工作揭示了以往方法未能捕捉到的关于诱发网络反应和持续活动的新见解,对功率和FC具有相同动态这一假设提出了挑战。