Lanier Abbigail L, Schemera Bettina, Rynders Patricia E, Kendall Trisha, Petrofski Myra, Spooner Jennifer, Samollow Paul B, VandeBerg John L, Wang Xu
1Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
2Auburn University Center for Advanced Science, Innovation, and Commerce, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 1;64(1):89-97. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-060.
The laboratory opossum, Monodelphis domestica, serves as a critical marsupial model in biomedical research. Proper feeding approaches are essential for promoting animal growth and wellbeing. In this study, we systematically evaluated food scattering and potential food contamination from feces across 4 feeding methods: direct placement of food pellets on bedding and using 3 different types of containers. We conducted timed daily observations of food scattering and marking behaviors in 22 animals, capturing images by photograph at specific intervals over the course of a week. Body weight was measured before and after the trial. Our findings revealed that the containers did not prevent food scattering behaviors, as evidenced by comparable survival curves for food scattering across all methods (P > 0.05, log-rank test). Although the paper tray and ceramic dish delayed the occurrence of food marking by feces, indicated by a significant extension in the time to marking events (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively), these containers introduced new animal welfare concerns. The paper tray increased bleeding incidents in digits and paw pads nearly 8-fold (P = 0.0002), presumably due to sharp edges. The ceramic dish was associated with urine marking, and small but statistically significant weight loss (0.7%, P < 0.05). By 144 h, all cages showed food contamination regardless of the feeding method. The results suggest that containers provide minimal benefit in preventing food contamination, and some types of containers may pose health risks. Therefore, we propose that placing food pellets directly on the bedding, a practice used for 45 y of laboratory opossum maintenance, is acceptable for promoting optimal health and operational efficiency for this species. Our results fill a significant gap in care practices and offer insights into optimal colony management for this important research model.
实验室负鼠(Monodelphis domestica)是生物医学研究中的一种关键有袋动物模型。适当的喂养方法对于促进动物生长和健康至关重要。在本研究中,我们系统评估了4种喂养方法下食物散落情况以及粪便对食物的潜在污染:将食物颗粒直接放置在垫料上,以及使用3种不同类型的容器。我们对22只动物的食物散落和标记行为进行了每日定时观察,在一周的时间内按特定间隔拍照记录。在试验前后测量了体重。我们的研究结果表明,容器并不能防止食物散落行为,所有方法下食物散落的生存曲线相当(P>0.05,对数秩检验)即证明了这一点。尽管纸盘和陶瓷盘延迟了粪便标记食物的发生,标记事件的时间显著延长表明了这一点(分别为P = 0.009和P < 0.001),但这些容器带来了新的动物福利问题。纸盘使手指和爪垫出血事件增加了近8倍(P = 0.0002),可能是由于边缘锋利。陶瓷盘与尿液标记有关,并且体重有小幅度但具有统计学意义的下降(0.7%,P < 0.05)。到144小时时,无论采用何种喂养方法,所有笼子都出现了食物污染。结果表明,容器在防止食物污染方面益处极小,某些类型的容器可能会带来健康风险。因此,我们建议将食物颗粒直接放置在垫料上,这种用于实验室负鼠饲养45年的做法,对于促进该物种的最佳健康和操作效率是可以接受的。我们的研究结果填补了护理实践中的一个重大空白,并为这个重要研究模型的最佳群体管理提供了见解。