Lee T F, Mora F, Myers R D
Am J Physiol. 1985 Jun;248(6 Pt 2):R674-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1985.248.6.R674.
In the adult monkey (Macaca fasicularis) acclimated to a primate restraint chair, intracerebroventricular (ICV) cannulas were stereotaxically implanted bilaterally in the lateral cerebral ventricle. During an experiment, colonic and skin temperatures were continuously recorded, and in selected cases heart and respiratory rates as well as O2 consumption were similarly monitored. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) was infused ICV in a volume of 500 microliter in one of six doses ranging from 16 to 4,240 ng. The results showed that AVP in all doses infused failed to alter the resting core and skin temperatures of the monkey or other recorded physiological responses. After a fever was produced in the monkey by 1/10-1/100 dilution of Escherichia coli endotoxin infused ICV, AVP at doses of 16-260 ng did not augment the febrile response. Further, AVP infused in the same range of doses caused only a negligible and inconsistent antipyretic action; i.e., the 65-ng dose of AVP lowered the mean core temperature of the febrile monkey by only 0.5 degrees C. This was in marked contrast to the antipyretic effect of dipyrone administered systemically. In addition, no reproducible changes occurred in respiratory, heart, or metabolic rates after ICV infusion of AVP. These results indicate that AVP does not affect the normal thermoregulatory function of this species of monkey and, in contrast to other species, a febrile response is neither enhanced nor antagonized in the monkey by a central action of AVP. Although AVP thus does not appear to be an endogenous antipyretic in the monkey, anatomic investigations will be required to substantiate this conclusion in the subhuman primate.
在适应了灵长类动物约束椅的成年恒河猴(食蟹猴)中,双侧立体定向地将脑室内(ICV)插管植入侧脑室。在实验过程中,持续记录结肠和皮肤温度,在选定的情况下,类似地监测心率、呼吸频率以及氧气消耗量。以500微升的体积向脑室内注入精氨酸加压素(AVP),剂量范围为6种,从16到4240纳克不等。结果表明,注入的所有剂量的AVP均未能改变猴子的静息核心体温和皮肤温度或其他记录的生理反应。在通过向脑室内注入1/10 - 1/100稀释的大肠杆菌内毒素使猴子发热后,16 - 260纳克剂量的AVP并未增强发热反应。此外,注入相同剂量范围内的AVP仅引起可忽略不计且不一致的解热作用;即,65纳克剂量的AVP仅使发热猴子的平均核心体温降低了0.5摄氏度。这与全身给予安乃近的解热效果形成了显著对比。此外,向脑室内注入AVP后,呼吸、心率或代谢率没有出现可重复的变化。这些结果表明,AVP不影响这种猴子的正常体温调节功能,并且与其他物种不同,AVP的中枢作用在猴子中既不增强也不拮抗发热反应。尽管AVP因此似乎不是猴子体内的内源性解热物质,但需要进行解剖学研究以在非人灵长类动物中证实这一结论。