Papadopoulou Christianna I, Athanasiou Maria, Gkantidis Nikolaos, Kanavakis Georgios
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, UZB-University School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 40, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Center for Oral Health Sciences CC3, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Assmannshauser Straße 4-6, DE-14197, Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Orthod. 2025 Feb 7;47(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf008.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Third molar agenesis and palatally impacted canines (PICs) are two independent dental phenotypes with different developmental backgrounds. Isolated reports indicate a common genetic origin for both, however, current data is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of third molar agenesis in individuals with PICs, compared to individuals without PICs.
MATERIALS/METHODS: This retrospective case-control study comprised 310 individuals (188 females and 122 males), half of whom presented with unilateral or bilateral PICs. Individuals with other dental anomalies of known genetic origin were excluded. The association between PICs and third molar agenesis was assessed using four regression models, with PIC as the dependent variable and sex, age, and third molar agenesis as predictors. One model treated PIC as a nominal variable (pattern) and the other as ordinal (severity), and both were run testing either third molar agenesis severity or third molar agenesis patterns. All statistical tests were performed assuming a type-1 error of 5%.
There was no significant association between canine impaction and third molar agenesis in any of the four regression models. Neither the severity nor the patterns of palatally impacted canines were associated with either the severity or the patterns of third molar agenesis (P > .05).
Due to the common racial background of all participants, the results of this investigation might not be generalizable to the general population.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Palatal canine impaction is not associated to third molar agenesis, after accounting for age, sex, and various patterns of PICs and third molar agenesis. These results indicate that these two dental phenotypes do not share a common biological mechanism for their occurrence.
背景/目的:第三磨牙缺失和腭侧阻生尖牙(PICs)是两种具有不同发育背景的独立牙列表型。个别报告表明两者存在共同的遗传起源,然而,目前的数据并不一致。本研究的目的是调查与无PICs的个体相比,有PICs的个体中第三磨牙缺失的情况。
材料/方法:这项回顾性病例对照研究包括310名个体(188名女性和122名男性),其中一半表现为单侧或双侧PICs。排除有已知遗传起源的其他牙列异常的个体。使用四个回归模型评估PICs与第三磨牙缺失之间的关联,以PIC为因变量,性别、年龄和第三磨牙缺失为预测变量。一个模型将PIC视为名义变量(模式),另一个视为有序变量(严重程度),两者均运行以测试第三磨牙缺失的严重程度或第三磨牙缺失模式。所有统计检验均在假设I型错误率为5%的情况下进行。
在四个回归模型中的任何一个中,尖牙阻生与第三磨牙缺失之间均无显著关联。腭侧阻生尖牙的严重程度和模式均与第三磨牙缺失的严重程度或模式无关(P>0.05)。
由于所有参与者具有共同的种族背景,本研究结果可能不适用于一般人群。
结论/启示:在考虑年龄、性别以及PICs和第三磨牙缺失的各种模式后,腭侧尖牙阻生与第三磨牙缺失无关。这些结果表明,这两种牙列表型的发生不存在共同的生物学机制。