• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第三代核电HPR1000的广泛采用会增强对温室气体净排放量的缓解作用吗?

Would widespread adoption of third-generation nuclear power HPR1000 enhance the mitigation of net greenhouse gas emissions?

作者信息

Liu Bojie, Liu Gengyuan, Li Hao, Hu Jiang, Shang Xin, Yao Jingyue, Xue Tianran, Zhang Yichi, Chen Caocao, Xu Linyu

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100840, China.

出版信息

iScience. 2025 Jan 31;28(3):111923. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111923. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2025.111923
PMID:40040802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11876914/
Abstract

Amid the rapid deployment of third-generation nuclear power, our understanding of its actual contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions remains limited. In a case study focused on China's mainstream third-generation nuclear power technology, HPR1000, we constructed a life cycle carbon accounting framework for nuclear power plants (LCCA-NPP). Our analysis encompassed the entire life cycle of HPR1000, including construction, operation, and decommissioning. The total life cycle GHG emissions for HPR1000 range from 10.66 to 11.19 Tg COe, with the carbon emission intensity of 10.03-10.54 g COe/kWh. As China advances toward its carbon neutrality objective, the contribution of nuclear power in offsetting carbon emissions from fossil fuels is projected to rise from about 3% in 2020 to 7%-8% by 2030. By the mid-century mark in 2050, it is anticipated that nuclear power will offset roughly 70% of carbon emissions from fossil energy sources.

摘要

在第三代核电迅速部署的背景下,我们对其在减少温室气体(GHG)排放方面的实际贡献的了解仍然有限。在一项以中国主流第三代核电技术“华龙一号”(HPR1000)为重点的案例研究中,我们构建了核电站生命周期碳核算框架(LCCA-NPP)。我们的分析涵盖了“华龙一号”的整个生命周期,包括建设、运营和退役。“华龙一号”的全生命周期温室气体排放总量在10.66至11.19太克二氧化碳当量之间,碳排放强度为10.03-10.54克二氧化碳当量/千瓦时。随着中国朝着碳中和目标迈进,核电在抵消化石燃料碳排放方面的贡献预计将从2020年的约3%升至2030年的7%-8%。到2050年中叶,预计核电将抵消约70%的化石能源碳排放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/53718efc0e52/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/ef2ff4bcfa6a/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/3b0741605f3b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/383ec0795193/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/fd2f63151ca3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/f964743aedcf/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/cf94f1b73542/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/53718efc0e52/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/ef2ff4bcfa6a/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/3b0741605f3b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/383ec0795193/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/fd2f63151ca3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/f964743aedcf/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/cf94f1b73542/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cbf/11876914/53718efc0e52/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Would widespread adoption of third-generation nuclear power HPR1000 enhance the mitigation of net greenhouse gas emissions?第三代核电HPR1000的广泛采用会增强对温室气体净排放量的缓解作用吗?
iScience. 2025 Jan 31;28(3):111923. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111923. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.
2
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Uranium Mining and Milling in Canada.加拿大铀矿开采和加工的生命周期温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 6;50(17):9746-53. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06072. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
3
Considering Embodied Greenhouse Emissions of Nuclear and Renewable Power Plants for Electrolytic Hydrogen and Its Use for Synthetic Ammonia, Methanol, Fischer-Tropsch Fuel Production. 考虑核电和可再生能源发电厂的温室气体排放用于电解氢气及其用于合成氨、甲醇、费托燃料生产。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 22;58(42):18654-18662. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06769. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Understanding the greenhouse gas emissions from China's wastewater treatment plants: Based on life cycle assessment coupled with statistical data.了解中国污水处理厂的温室气体排放:基于生命周期评估并结合统计数据。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023 Jul 1;259:115007. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115007. Epub 2023 May 18.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
Spatial patterns of net greenhouse gas balance and intensity in Chinese orchard system.中国果园系统净温室气体平衡和强度的空间格局。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 20;779:146250. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146250. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Regulation Mechanism for Designing Decarbonization Pathways in the Copper Industry Toward Carbon Neutrality.铜工业实现碳中和的脱碳路径设计的调控机制。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jan 23;58(3):1518-1530. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09314. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
The evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage treatment with urbanization: Understanding the opportunities and challenges for climate change mitigation in China's low-carbon pilot city, Shenzhen.城市化进程中污水处理的温室气体排放评估:理解中国低碳试点城市深圳气候变化缓解的机遇和挑战。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158629. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Comparative lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and their reduction potential for typical petrochemical enterprises in China.中国典型石化企业生命周期温室气体排放比较及减排潜力。
J Environ Sci (China). 2022 Jun;116:125-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.05.031. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Parametric Life Cycle Assessment of Nuclear Power for Simplified Models.核动力的参数化生命周期评估:简化模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 26;57(38):14194-14205. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03190. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
The global power sector's low-carbon transition may enhance sustainable development goal achievement.全球能源部门的低碳转型可能会促进可持续发展目标的实现。
Nat Commun. 2023 May 30;14(1):3144. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38987-4.
3
Energy security: nuclear power versus renewables.能源安全:核能与可再生能源
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7924):667. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-02239-0.
4
Cost increase in the electricity supply to achieve carbon neutrality in China.中国实现碳中和过程中电力供应成本的增加。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 8;13(1):3172. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30747-0.
5
Nuclear energy, ten years after Fukushima.福岛核事故十年后的核能。
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7849):199-201. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00580-4.
6
Assessing the water and carbon footprint of hydropower stations at a national scale.在国家层面评估水电站的水足迹和碳足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:595-612. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.148. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Uranium Mining and Milling in Canada.加拿大铀矿开采和加工的生命周期温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 6;50(17):9746-53. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06072. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
8
How carbon-friendly is nuclear energy? A hybrid MRIO-LCA model of a Spanish facility.核能有多环保?西班牙设施的混合 MRIO-LCA 模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Dec 16;48(24):14103-11. doi: 10.1021/es503352s. Epub 2014 Dec 1.