Cucoş Alexandra, Dicu Tiberius, Moldovan Mircea, Dobrei Gabriel, Ţenter Ancuţa, Florică Ştefan, Lupulescu Alexandru, Maloş Cristian, Papp Botond, Hening Kinga, Pap Istvan, Moldovan Alina, Burghele Bety, Sainz Carlos
"Constantin Cosma" Radon Laboratory (LiRaCC), Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, "Babeş-Bolyai" University, Fântânele Street, no. 30, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Montessori Atlas School, Aleea Valeriu Bologa, no. 3, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 12;11(4):e42659. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42659. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
Radon accumulation in indoor environments poses a significant public health concern, especially in educational institutions, where children are particularly vulnerable. This study investigates indoor radon activity concentrations (IRAC) in 198 educational institutions and 266 houses from Cluj-Napoca, Romania, analyzing a total of 1440 rooms. Radon levels were assessed using CR-39 track detectors, with measurements conducted over three and twelve-month periods for educational and residential buildings, respectively. Preliminary results reveal notable differences in IRAC between the two building types, with 24 % of educational institutions and 13 % of houses exceeding the reference level of 300 Bq/m³. Factors such as the presence of basements, construction materials, and ventilation systems were found to significantly influence IRAC. A room-level analysis highlighted that those laboratories and classrooms that were located on lower floors had the highest IRAC, while flooring type and structural barriers played a critical role in mitigation. The study contributes by reinforcing the importance of accounting for building-specific characteristics in radon exposure assessments and highlights the need for tailored mitigation strategies in different building types. Moreover, the findings raise important questions about the representativeness of residential radon maps for public buildings, emphasizing that spatial correlations between the two building types remain low.
室内环境中的氡气积聚对公众健康构成重大威胁,尤其是在教育机构中,儿童尤为脆弱。本研究调查了罗马尼亚克卢日-纳波卡市198所教育机构和266所房屋中的室内氡气活度浓度(IRAC),共分析了1440个房间。使用CR-39径迹探测器评估氡气水平,分别对教育建筑和住宅建筑进行了为期三个月和十二个月的测量。初步结果显示,两种建筑类型的IRAC存在显著差异,24%的教育机构和13%的房屋超过了300 Bq/m³的参考水平。发现地下室的存在、建筑材料和通风系统等因素对IRAC有显著影响。房间层面的分析突出表明,位于较低楼层的实验室和教室的IRAC最高,而地板类型和结构屏障在缓解方面起着关键作用。该研究通过强化在氡气暴露评估中考虑特定建筑特征的重要性做出了贡献,并强调了针对不同建筑类型制定量身定制的缓解策略的必要性。此外,研究结果还引发了关于公共建筑住宅氡气地图代表性的重要问题,强调两种建筑类型之间的空间相关性仍然较低。