Ordonez Alejandra, Hussain Usman, Cambon Marine C, Golyshin Peter N, Downie Jim, McDonald James E
School of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.
School of Biosciences, Institute of Microbiology and Infection, Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
ISME Commun. 2025 Feb 11;5(1):ycaf019. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Microbial isolation methods are crucial for producing comprehensive microbial culture collections that reflect the richness and diversity of natural microbiotas. Few studies have focused on isolation of plant-associated microbiota, with even less focus on forest trees. Here, we tested two isolation methods, (i) agar plating and (ii) dilution-to-extinction, for isolation of microbiota from leaf, stem, and root/rhizosphere tissues of oak trees. Microbial isolates obtained (culture-dependent) and the endogenous oak microbiota of the source tissue samples (culture-independent) were characterized by 16S rRNA gene and ITS community profiling. We found that the type of growth medium, incubation conditions, and sample type inoculated onto agar influenced the number of isolates and taxonomic richness of the isolates obtained. Most bacterial and fungal ASVs obtained from isolation-based approaches were only obtained using one of the two isolation methods, with only 12% of the ASVs detected in both. Moreover, the isolation methods captured microorganisms not detected by culture-independent analysis of the microbiota, suggesting these approaches can complement culture-independent analysis by enriching low-abundant taxa. Our results suggest that dilution-to-extinction and agar-plating approaches captured distinct fractions of the oak microbiota, and that a combination of both isolation methods was required to produce taxonomically richer microbial culture collections.
微生物分离方法对于构建能够反映自然微生物群丰富性和多样性的全面微生物培养物保藏库至关重要。很少有研究关注植物相关微生物群的分离,而关注林木相关微生物群分离的研究更少。在这里,我们测试了两种从橡树的叶、茎和根/根际组织中分离微生物群的方法,(i)琼脂平板培养法和(ii)稀释至灭绝法。通过16S rRNA基因和ITS群落分析对获得的微生物分离株(基于培养的方法)和源组织样本中的内源性橡树微生物群(非培养的方法)进行了表征。我们发现,生长培养基类型、培养条件以及接种到琼脂上的样本类型会影响分离株的数量和所获得分离株的分类丰富度。从基于分离的方法中获得的大多数细菌和真菌扩增子序列变异(ASV)仅通过两种分离方法中的一种获得,两种方法都检测到的ASV仅占12%。此外,这些分离方法捕获了通过微生物群的非培养分析未检测到的微生物,这表明这些方法可以通过富集低丰度分类群来补充非培养分析。我们的结果表明,稀释至灭绝法和琼脂平板培养法捕获了橡树微生物群的不同部分,并且需要将这两种分离方法结合起来才能产生分类更丰富的微生物培养物保藏库。