Tavanaei Tamanaei Taraneh, Oghazian Mohammad Bagher, Mojtabaee Mehran, Faregh Mojdeh, Oghazian Sahar, Tavana Erfan, Hoseinzadeh Amin, Haghighi Ramin
Lung Diseases Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Hassan Hospital North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences Bojnurd Iran.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 2;8(3):e70492. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70492. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Accurate and transparent investigation of adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination enhances social trust and confidence in vaccination programs. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs among medical sciences students.
In this cross-sectional study, a self-administered survey via Google Forms was conducted to evaluate AEs associated with the AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccines among medical sciences students. Data were collected following participation in a training program focused on the symptomatology of AEs, which was designed to reduce confirmation bias.
A total of 263 medical sciences students from North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran, participated in this study, with data collection occurring from August 8 to September 1, 2021. The median age of the study population was 23 years (IQR: 22-24), with 207 participants being female (78.7%). Following the first dose, the prevalence of AEs was significantly more common in the Oxford-AstraZeneca group compared to the Sinopharm group [OR 12.93 (5.57-30.03), < 0.001]. However, in the second dose, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of AEs between the Oxford-AstraZeneca group compared to the Sinopharm group [OR 1.45 (0.86-2.46), = 0.17]. Injection site pain, fever, body/muscle pain, headache, feeling unwell, and fatigue were the most common AEs associated with both vaccines, with variations in the prevalence between the vaccines and between doses. The type of vaccine and sex were the only factors influencing the prevalence of AEs. Notably, the odds of experiencing AEs were higher in women compared to men.
The findings of this study indicated that the prevalence of AEs was higher for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared to the Sinopharm vaccine. Further research is necessary to explore the impact of utilizing standardized definitions and common terminology for COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs in ensuring accurate and consistent reporting.
对新冠疫苗接种后的不良事件(AE)进行准确且透明的调查,可增强社会对疫苗接种计划的信任。本研究旨在评估医学生中与新冠疫苗接种相关的不良事件的发生率。
在这项横断面研究中,通过谷歌表单进行了一项自我管理的调查,以评估医科学生中与AZD1222(牛津 - 阿斯利康)和BBIBP - CorV(国药集团)疫苗相关的不良事件。在参加了一个专注于不良事件症状学的培训项目后收集数据,该项目旨在减少确认偏倚。
来自伊朗博季努尔德霍拉桑医科大学的263名医科学生参与了本研究,数据收集时间为2021年8月8日至9月1日。研究人群的中位年龄为23岁(四分位间距:22 - 24),207名参与者为女性(78.7%)。接种第一剂后,牛津 - 阿斯利康组的不良事件发生率显著高于国药集团组[比值比12.93(5.57 - 30.03),<0.001]。然而,接种第二剂后,牛津 - 阿斯利康组与国药集团组的不良事件发生率无显著差异[比值比1.45(0.86 - 2.46),=0.17]。注射部位疼痛、发热、身体/肌肉疼痛、头痛、不适和疲劳是两种疫苗最常见的不良事件,不同疫苗及不同剂量之间的发生率存在差异。疫苗类型和性别是影响不良事件发生率的唯一因素。值得注意的是,女性发生不良事件的几率高于男性。
本研究结果表明,牛津 - 阿斯利康疫苗的不良事件发生率高于国药集团疫苗。有必要进一步研究采用标准化定义和通用术语对新冠疫苗接种相关不良事件进行报告,以确保报告的准确性和一致性。