Agudelo Olga L, Reyes-Loaiza Vanessa, Giraldo-Parra Lina, Rosales-Chilama Mariana, Perdomo Sammy, Gómez María Adelaida, Rodriguez John W, Ortega Viviana, Daza Rivera Carlos F, Galindo Diana, Valencia Drochss P, Quimbaya Mauricio, Plata Simón, Bogdanowicz Robert, Rosso Fernando, Jaramillo-Botero Andres
Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas (CIC), Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 No. 18 - 49, 760032, Cali, Colombia.
iOMICAS, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Calle 18 # 118-250, Cali, Colombia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92104-7.
We designed, developed, and clinically tested two rapid antigen-based immunosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection, enabling diagnosis and viral load quantification for under USD $2. In a first clinical study, a screen-printed disposable carbon-based (SPC) sensor was assessed on prospectively recruited adult participants classified into three study groups: healthy donors (n = 46); SARS-CoV-2-infected symptomatic patients (n = 58); and co-habitants of patients without prior testing (n = 38). Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NA), oropharyngeal swabs (OS), and saliva (SA) samples were obtained from all participants. Performance was measured in terms of clinical sensitivity and specificity against a reference diagnostic RT-qPCR kit and analytical sensitivity (limit of detection, LoD) and specificity using recombinant material in lab tests. A second study was performed using the same sensor design, albeit with laser-induced graphene (LIG) electrodes, using nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) on 224 patient samples obtained at different stages of the pandemic, of which 110 tested negative and 114 positive via RT-qPCR. We find OS was the most informative sample, when compared to NA and SA. The SPC-based sensors had a 93.8% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity with OS samples, while the LIG-based sensors with NS had a lower sensitivity of 68.93%, albeit a significantly higher specificity of 86.17%. We believe specificity values for the SPC sensors were driven by positive results from co-habitants and healthy donors and were affected by the low sensitivity (75.5%) and high LoD (> 20,000 viral copies/mL) of the reference RT-qPCR kit used, and the lower sensitivity of the LIG-based was due to a reduced set of effective antigen-binding sites caused by the non-covalent LIG-mAb ligands used. The immunosensor's LoD to spike protein in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for both types of sensors was near 1 fg/mL and showed no cross-reactivity to recombinant structural proteins of Epstein-Barr and Influenza. Performance metrics and time-to-result (5 < 12 min) provide proof-of-principle of the immunosensor's applicability as a low-cost, rapid technology for determining SARS-CoV-2 infections. Changing the working electrode material to LIG, instead of SPC, improved specificity even in the presence of pathogen variants. Discordant results between our two immunosensor versions and RT-qPCR tests are attributed not only to limited antibody effectiveness in the former but also to the quality of RT-qPCR probes used at the height of the pandemic.
我们设计、开发并对两种用于检测新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的基于快速抗原的免疫传感器进行了临床测试,能够以低于2美元的成本进行诊断和病毒载量定量。在第一项临床研究中,对前瞻性招募的成年参与者进行了评估,这些参与者被分为三个研究组:健康捐赠者(n = 46);感染新型冠状病毒且有症状的患者(n = 58);以及未经事先检测的患者的同居者(n = 38)。从所有参与者那里获取了鼻咽抽吸物(NA)、口咽拭子(OS)和唾液(SA)样本。根据针对参考诊断逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)试剂盒的临床敏感性和特异性,以及在实验室测试中使用重组材料的分析敏感性(检测限,LoD)和特异性来衡量性能。第二项研究使用了相同的传感器设计,不过采用了激光诱导石墨烯(LIG)电极,对在疫情不同阶段获取的224份患者样本使用了鼻咽拭子(NS),其中110份经RT-qPCR检测为阴性,114份为阳性。我们发现,与NA和SA相比,OS是信息量最大的样本。基于SPC的传感器对OS样本的敏感性为93.8%,特异性为61.5%,而基于LIG的传感器对NS样本的敏感性较低,为68.93%,尽管特异性显著更高,为86.17%。我们认为,SPC传感器的特异性值是由同居者和健康捐赠者的阳性结果驱动的,并且受到所使用的参考RT-qPCR试剂盒的低敏感性(75.5%)和高LoD(> 20,000病毒拷贝/毫升)的影响,而基于LIG的传感器敏感性较低是由于所使用的非共价LIG-单克隆抗体(mAb)配体导致有效抗原结合位点减少。两种类型传感器在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中对刺突蛋白的LoD接近1 fg/毫升,并且对爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒和流感病毒的重组结构蛋白无交叉反应。性能指标和出结果时间(5 < 12分钟)证明了该免疫传感器作为一种低成本、快速技术用于确定新型冠状病毒感染的原理。将工作电极材料从SPC改为LIG,即使在存在病原体变体的情况下也提高了特异性。我们的两种免疫传感器版本与RT-qPCR测试之间的不一致结果不仅归因于前者中抗体效力有限,还归因于疫情高峰期所使用的RT-qPCR探针的质量。