Li Jiayu, Lin Zhendiao, Zou Mengting, Feng Xin, Liu Yuanyue
College of Teacher Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22151-2.
This study investigates the relationship between movement behaviors and physical fitness (PF) in university students, and based on the top 5% of model-predicted outcomes for PF to determine the optimal movement behaviors balance.
A total of 463 university students aged 15-24 years from Jinhua City wore accelerometers to measure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and sedentary behavior (SB). Sleep (SLP) was self-reported. The body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity (FVC), 50-meter dash, standing long jump, sit-and-reach, sit-ups (female), pull-ups (male), 800-meter run (female), and 1000-meter run (male) were used as indicators to assess the physical fitness of university students. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between movement behaviors and PF. All possible movement component combinations were investigated to determine the best correlation (top 5%) with each outcome.
For males, SB (β = 5.05, p < 0.05) was significantly correlated with an increase in BMI. MVPA was significantly correlated with improvements in BMI (β = -1.75, p < 0.05), FVC (β = 494.21, p < 0.05), and endurance qualities (β = -25.77, p < 0.05). For females, MVPA was significantly correlated with improvements in BMI (β = -1.03, p < 0.05), FVC (β = 176.05, p < 0.05), speed capability (β = -0.26, p < 0.05), and endurance qualities (β = -16.38, p < 0.05). LPA was associated with improvements in endurance qualities (β = -24.10, p < 0.05). SB was significantly correlated with a decline in endurance qualities (β = 24.25, p < 0.05). The average (range) optimal combination of time use was as follows: For males, MVPA = 142 min/day, SB = 534 min/day, LPA = 295 min/day, and SLP = 469 min/day. For females, MVPA = 115 min/day, SB = 536 min/day, LPA = 306 min/day, and SLP = 482 min/day.
For both males and females, increased MVPA and reduced sedentary time were associated with improved endurance and strength, while optimal sleep duration contributed to overall fitness. These findings highlight the importance of a balanced daily movement schedule for university students.
本研究调查大学生运动行为与身体素质(PF)之间的关系,并基于PF模型预测结果的前5%来确定最佳运动行为平衡。
来自金华市的463名15 - 24岁大学生佩戴加速度计以测量中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)、轻度身体活动(LPA)和久坐行为(SB)。睡眠(SLP)通过自我报告获取。身体质量指数(BMI)、用力肺活量(FVC)、50米短跑、立定跳远、坐位体前屈、仰卧起坐(女性)、引体向上(男性)、800米跑(女性)和1000米跑(男性)被用作评估大学生身体素质的指标。采用回归分析来检验运动行为与PF之间的关系。研究了所有可能的运动成分组合,以确定与每个结果的最佳相关性(前5%)。
对于男性,SB(β = 5.05,p < 0.05)与BMI增加显著相关。MVPA与BMI改善(β = -1.75,p < 0.05)、FVC(β = 494.21,p < 0.05)和耐力素质改善(β = -25.77,p < 0.05)显著相关。对于女性,MVPA与BMI改善(β = -1.03,p < 0.05)、FVC(β = 176.05,p < 0.05)、速度能力(β = -0.26,p < 0.05)和耐力素质改善(β = -16.38,p < 0.05)显著相关。LPA与耐力素质改善相关(β = -24.10,p < 0.05)。SB与耐力素质下降显著相关(β = 24.25,p < 0.05)。时间使用的平均(范围)最佳组合如下:对于男性,MVPA = 142分钟/天,SB = 534分钟/天,LPA = 295分钟/天,SLP = 469分钟/天。对于女性,MVPA = 115分钟/天,SB = 536分钟/天,LPA = 306分钟/天,SLP = 482分钟/天。
对于男性和女性而言,增加MVPA和减少久坐时间与耐力和力量的改善相关,而最佳睡眠时间有助于整体健康。这些发现凸显了大学生每日运动计划平衡的重要性。