West Eloise, Baer Carolyn, Yu Lisa, Odic Darko
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia & Algoma University, Brampton, Canada.
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e13617. doi: 10.1111/desc.13617.
Metacognitive reasoning is central to decision-making. For every decision, we can also judge our trust in that decision, or our level of confidence. The mechanisms and representations underlying reasoning about confidence remain debated. We test whether children rely on processing fluency to infer their own confidence: do decisions that come quickly and easily lead to high confidence, while decisions that are slow and effortful result in low confidence? Using children's verbal disfluency-fillers (e.g., "umm," "uhh"), hedges (e.g., "I think," "maybe"), and pauses in speech-as an observable index of processing fluency, we assess whether children's reports of confidence are a read-out of their verbal disfluency. Five-to-eight-year-olds answered semantic questions about animals and performed perceptual comparisons, then reported their confidence in their answers in a two-alternative forced-choice confidence judgment task. Verbal disfluency predicted both answer accuracy and children's reports of confidence: children produced more fillers, more hedges, and longer speech onsets during incorrect trials and during low confidence trials. But we also found a dissociation between fluency and confidence. When examining trials where accuracy and confidence diverge (i.e., correct but low confidence or incorrect but high confidence trials), we observe no reliable relationship between confidence and fillers and hedges, and children take longer to begin answering on high confidence trials. We conclude that-in 5-8-year-old-children-fluency is a reliable tracker of accuracy but not confidence, and that fluency is only predictive of metacognitive judgments in children when confidence and accuracy are aligned.
元认知推理是决策的核心。对于每一个决策,我们还可以判断自己对该决策的信任程度,即信心水平。关于信心推理的潜在机制和表征仍存在争议。我们测试儿童是否依赖加工流畅性来推断自己的信心:快速且轻松做出的决策是否会带来高信心,而缓慢且费力做出的决策是否会导致低信心?我们将儿童言语中的不流畅填充词(如“嗯”“呃”)、模糊限制语(如“我想”“也许”)以及言语停顿作为加工流畅性的可观察指标,评估儿童的信心报告是否是其言语不流畅性的一种体现。5至8岁的儿童回答关于动物的语义问题并进行感知比较,然后在二选一的强制选择信心判断任务中报告他们对答案的信心。言语不流畅性既能预测答案的准确性,也能预测儿童的信心报告:在回答错误的试验和信心较低的试验中,儿童会产生更多的填充词、更多的模糊限制语,且言语起始时间更长。但我们也发现了流畅性与信心之间的分离。在检查准确性和信心出现分歧的试验(即回答正确但信心低或回答错误但信心高的试验)时,我们观察到信心与填充词和模糊限制语之间没有可靠的关系,而且儿童在信心高的试验中开始回答的时间更长。我们得出结论:在5至8岁的儿童中,流畅性是准确性的可靠指标,但不是信心的可靠指标,并且只有当信心和准确性一致时,流畅性才能够预测儿童的元认知判断。