Burger Philomena, Botros Mina, El-Zein Zein, Holleran Amanda, Ketz John, Flemister A Sam, Ciufo David
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2025 Jul;46(7):715-722. doi: 10.1177/10711007251336756. Epub 2025 May 26.
Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury in the adult population. The role of operative and nonoperative management remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles rupture.
Patients with Achilles ruptures were identified as either undergoing surgical repair or nonoperative functional rehabilitation. The primary outcomes were PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores. These were routinely collected prospectively during the initial office visit and follow-up appointments. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which was ½ SD of each PROMIS domain. These values were further used to calculate the percentage of patients who returned to population mean PROMIS scores at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound healing, infections, and reruptures.
A total of 216 patients were included (115 nonoperative, 101 operative). Patients treated operatively were younger (35.6 vs 45.1 years, < .001), with slightly lower BMI ( = .011). Sex distribution among the groups were similar ( = .933). Both treatments improved PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores. Although there was a trend toward achieving population means in PF earlier in the operative group, the groups equalized over time, with no statistically significant difference between treatment groups for the percentage of patients who were below, at, or above population mean PROMIS values at 6 months and final follow-up. There was no difference in rerupture rates or identified DVTs. However, there were increased wound issues in the operative group ( = .035), with 12.8% symptomatic scarring, 6% infections, 3% delayed healing, and 3% with palpable nodules, compared with 1 case of cellulitis in a nonoperative patient.
In our patients with an Achilles tendon rupture, on average, operative management was not associated with statistically meaningful differences in patient-reported physical function compared with nonoperative treatment. Surgery also comes at the cost of increased wound/complication rates and was associated with modestly slower improvement in pain and depression scores.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
跟腱断裂是成人中的常见损伤。手术治疗和非手术治疗的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估和比较急性跟腱断裂手术治疗和非手术治疗后患者报告的结局,采用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)。
将跟腱断裂患者分为接受手术修复或非手术功能康复治疗两组。主要结局指标为PROMIS身体功能(PF)、疼痛干扰(PI)和抑郁评分。这些指标在初次门诊和随访预约时常规前瞻性收集。采用基于分布的方法确定最小临床重要差异(MCID),即每个PROMIS领域的½标准差。这些值进一步用于计算在最终随访时恢复到总体平均PROMIS评分的患者百分比。次要结局包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、伤口愈合、感染和再断裂。
共纳入216例患者(115例非手术治疗,101例手术治疗)。接受手术治疗的患者更年轻(35.6岁对45.1岁,P<0.001),体重指数略低(P=0.011)。两组间性别分布相似(P=0.933)。两种治疗方法均改善了PROMIS PF、PI和抑郁评分。虽然手术组在PF方面更早达到总体均值,但随着时间推移两组趋于相等,在6个月和最终随访时,治疗组中低于、等于或高于总体平均PROMIS值的患者百分比在统计学上无显著差异。再断裂率或确诊的DVT无差异。然而,手术组的伤口问题增加(P=0.035),有12.8%的患者出现有症状的瘢痕形成,6%的患者出现感染,3%的患者愈合延迟,3%的患者可触及结节,而非手术治疗的患者中有1例发生蜂窝织炎。
在我们的跟腱断裂患者中,平均而言,与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗在患者报告的身体功能方面无统计学意义上的显著差异。手术还伴随着伤口/并发症发生率增加的代价,且疼痛和抑郁评分改善略慢。
III级,回顾性队列研究。