• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Meta分析——森林图解读:见树又见林。

Meta-analysis - interpretation of forest plots: A wood for the trees.

作者信息

Sarkar Soumya, Baidya Dalim Kumar

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, AIIMS, Guwahati, Assam, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;69(1):147-152. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1155_24. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1155_24
PMID:40046702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11878362/
Abstract

A forest plot is a graphical tool to visualise and interpret the summary of estimated results in a meta-analysis. However, it is limited by its inability to control for random error, publication bias, heterogeneity, and confounding factors. Therefore, the interpretation can be misleading, resulting in flawed conclusions. A careful interpretation and other complementing techniques are necessary to comprehensively summarise evidence in meta-analyses, reducing the risk of erroneous conclusions. The present review explores the components of forest plots, how to interpret them correctly, fundamental limitations, and techniques to mitigate them, along with examples to provide practical insights to ensure more accurate and reliable meta-analytic results.

摘要

森林图是一种用于可视化和解释荟萃分析中估计结果总结的图形工具。然而,它存在局限性,无法控制随机误差、发表偏倚、异质性和混杂因素。因此,其解释可能会产生误导,导致结论有缺陷。在荟萃分析中,需要进行仔细的解释并采用其他补充技术来全面总结证据,以降低得出错误结论的风险。本综述探讨了森林图的组成部分、如何正确解释它们、基本局限性以及减轻这些局限性的技术,并通过实例提供实际见解,以确保获得更准确可靠的荟萃分析结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/11878362/4a55c4c0984d/IJA-69-147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/11878362/ae20afc92c4c/IJA-69-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/11878362/4a55c4c0984d/IJA-69-147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/11878362/ae20afc92c4c/IJA-69-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/11878362/4a55c4c0984d/IJA-69-147-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis - interpretation of forest plots: A wood for the trees.Meta分析——森林图解读:见树又见林。
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;69(1):147-152. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1155_24. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.基于样本量的漏斗图在荟萃分析中的图形增强。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Sep;10(3):376-388. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1340. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice.Meta分析的图形展示:概述及实践建议
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jan;1(1):66-80. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.6. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
5
Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.了解元分析的基础知识以及如何阅读森林图:就这么简单。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 6;81(5):20f13698. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13698.
6
The orchard plot: Cultivating a forest plot for use in ecology, evolution, and beyond.果园样地:为生态学、进化学及其他领域培育森林样地。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):4-12. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1424. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Interpreting Meta-Analyses: A Guide to Funnel and Forest Plots.解读荟萃分析:漏斗图和森林图指南。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 1;37(1):40-42. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001534. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
8
[Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].[关于发表偏倚检测的实际考量]
Gac Sanit. 2006 Dec;20 Suppl 3:10-6. doi: 10.1157/13101085.
9
Multiple uses of forest plots in presenting analysis results in health research: A Tutorial.森林图在健康研究分析结果呈现中的多重用途:教程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;117:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
10
Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots.在没有面包屑踪迹的情况下走出森林:两种新型森林图展示方式的开发与评估
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Mar;6(1):74-86. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1125. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to the comments on the "Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis".对“超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸腰筋膜间平面阻滞在腰椎手术患者中的疗效比较:系统评价与试验序贯Meta分析”评论的回复
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):422-423. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_116_25. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis.腰椎手术患者中超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸腰段筋膜间平面阻滞疗效比较:一项系统评价与试验序贯Meta分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;68(9):752-761. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_373_24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.环泊酚与丙泊酚用于全身麻醉诱导或镇静的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;68(9):776-794. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_104_24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
3
Comparison of the classical approach and costoclavicular approach of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导锁骨下阻滞经典方法与肋锁入路方法的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;68(7):606-615. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1124_23. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Comparison between dexmedetomidine and lidocaine for attenuation of cough response during tracheal extubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定与利多卡因用于减轻气管拔管时咳嗽反应的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 May;68(5):415-425. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_790_23. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
The Effect of Prophylactic Steroids on Shivering in Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性类固醇对行手术成年人寒战的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2023 Aug 1;137(2):332-344. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006578. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Correction: The 5 min meta-analysis: understanding how to read and interpret a forest plot.更正:5分钟荟萃分析:了解如何阅读和解读森林图。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Dec;37(17):3704. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02493-0.
7
Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis.序贯试验分析:荟萃分析的新方法。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Apr;16(2):138-150. doi: 10.17085/apm.21038. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Seeing the forest for the trees: How to interpret a meta-analysis forest plot.见林亦见树:如何解读Meta分析森林图
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Mar;77(3):1097-1101. doi: 10.1111/jan.14721. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analyses.Meta分析中发表偏倚的敏感性分析。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2020 Nov;69(5):1091-1119. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12440. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.评估系统评价中质量或偏倚风险的方法学工具和敏感性分析,发表于高影响力的麻醉学期刊。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 18;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00966-4.