• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guideline-Concordant Surveillance After Treatment for High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia.高级别宫颈发育异常治疗后的指南一致性监测
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 1;145(5):461-468. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005877. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
2
Delivering Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients With High-Risk HPV and Normal Cytologic Findings.为高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染且细胞学检查结果正常的患者提供符合指南的护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54969.
3
Risk of progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in human papillomavirus-vaccinated and unvaccinated women: a population-based cohort study.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种和未接种妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级进展的风险:基于人群的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):430.e1-430.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1235. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
5
Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.荷兰基于细胞学与基于高危型人乳头瘤病毒的宫颈癌筛查项目中的获益与负担
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):200.e1-200.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.人乳头瘤病毒检测在高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌筛查中的应用:POBASCAM 随机对照研究的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
Follow-up after treatment of high-grade cervical dysplasia: The utility of six-month colposcopy and cytology and routine 12-month colposcopy.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的随访:六个月阴道镜检查和细胞学检查及常规 12 个月阴道镜检查的应用。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;60(6):959-964. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13248. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage 试验:人乳头瘤病毒、宫颈细胞学和组织病理学结果,来自基线和 1 年随访阶段。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):278.e1-278.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.047. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study.成功治疗后复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的风险:一项长期多队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):441-50. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70078-X.
10
Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.细胞学监测与直接转诊阴道镜检查在低级别宫颈异常女性管理中的比较:多中心随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 Jul 28;339:b2546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2546.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.与宫颈癌检查结果异常后及时行阴道镜检查相关的因素。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107307. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in cervical cancer screening barriers and intentions: The My Body My Test-3 HPV self-collection trial among under-screened, low-income women.种族和民族差异对宫颈癌筛查障碍和意愿的影响:在未接受充分筛查的低收入女性中进行的 My Body My Test-3 HPV 自我采集试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0274974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274974. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda.评估和改进多层次背景下的癌症筛查过程质量:PROSPR II 联盟的设计和研究议程。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Aug 2;31(8):1521-1531. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0100.
4
Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.黑人女性与异常宫颈癌筛查随访相关的差异增加。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 16;42:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Development of a text message-based intervention for follow-up colposcopy among predominately underserved Black and Hispanic/Latinx women.基于短信的随访阴道镜检查干预措施的开发,主要针对服务不足的黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔女性。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Jun;33(6):861-873. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01573-y. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
6
Clinical follow-up practices after cervical cancer screening by co-testing: A population-based study of adherence to U.S. guideline recommendations.人乳头瘤病毒联合检测后宫颈癌筛查的临床随诊实践:一项基于人群的美国指南推荐依从性研究。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106770. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106770. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
7
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors.2019年美国阴道镜和子宫颈病理学会基于风险的子宫颈癌筛查异常检测及癌前病变管理共识指南。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525.
8
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.PROSPR I 联盟中的宫颈癌筛查研究:美国队列的基本原理、方法和基线结果。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1460-1473. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31940. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system.美国城市公共医疗系统中 HIV 感染女性的宫颈癌筛查。
AIDS. 2018 Aug 24;32(13):1861-1870. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001881.
10
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌教育及医疗服务提供者的筛查建议对筛查率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017.

高级别宫颈发育异常治疗后的指南一致性监测

Guideline-Concordant Surveillance After Treatment for High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia.

作者信息

Wang Victoria, Lykken Jacquelyn M, Tiro Jasmin A, Perkins Rebecca B, Haas Jennifer S, Werner Claudia, Kobrin Sarah C, Feldman Sarah

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, the Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Population and Data Sciences and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas; the Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, Illinois; and the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 1;145(5):461-468. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005877. Epub 2025 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005877
PMID:40048731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12005959/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify how many patients treated for high-grade cervical dysplasia completed guideline-concordant surveillance.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients aged 30-65 treated for high-grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse) at two PROSPR II METRICS (Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Multi-level Optimization of the Cervical Cancer Screening Process in Diverse Settings & Populations sites) (Massachusetts General Brigham, Parkland Health) from 2010 to 2019. The primary outcome was receipt of two negative co-tests after treatment within 30 months (allowing 6-month scheduling leeway).

RESULTS

Among 3,146 patients treated for high-grade dysplasia, most were aged 30-39 years (Massachusetts General Brigham 58.9%, Parkland Health 60.9%) and had no or few known comorbidities (Massachusetts General Brigham 81.2%, Parkland Health 85.6%). Race and ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic status reflected broader patient population demographics. Only half of the patients (45.5%) completed two surveillance co-tests after treatment within 30 months (Massachusetts General Brigham 55.3%, Parkland Health 40.6%), among whom a third received at least one subsequent abnormal co-test result (Massachusetts General Brigham 30.9%, Parkland Health 31.6%). Patients who completed two co-tests were under observation longer than those who did not complete two co-tests (median Massachusetts General Brigham 64.9 months vs 33.1 months, median Parkland Health 63.9 months vs 41.8 months). Among patients who completed two co-tests, the timing of surveillance co-testing was largely concordant with guidelines (median [interquartile range] time to first co-test: Massachusetts General Brigham 6.4 [5.1-9.2] months, Parkland Health 10.1 [6.6-12.6] months; median [interquartile range] time between first and second co-test: Massachusetts General Brigham 8.5 [6.0-12.6] months, Parkland Health 12.0 [8.0-13.5] months). Overall, 16 patients (0.5%) were diagnosed with cervical cancer after treatment for high-grade dysplasia (median [interquartile range] time from treatment to cancer diagnosis 14.9 [3.8-45.9] months).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of patients did not receive guideline-concordant surveillance after treatment for high-grade dysplasia, and one-third had a subsequent abnormal co-test result. Patients with high-grade cervical dysplasia are at elevated risk of subsequent abnormalities and should continue to be closely monitored. Additional systematic monitoring is needed to ensure guideline-compliant surveillance after dysplasia treatment.

摘要

目的

量化接受高级别宫颈发育异常治疗的患者中完成符合指南监测的人数。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2010年至2019年在两个PROSPR II METRICS(基于人群的研究以优化筛查过程,不同环境和人群中宫颈癌筛查过程的多层次优化)(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院、帕克兰健康中心)接受高级别宫颈发育异常(宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更严重)治疗的30至65岁患者。主要结局是治疗后30个月内接受两次联合检查结果均为阴性(允许有6个月的检查安排宽松期)。

结果

在3146例接受高级别发育异常治疗的患者中,大多数年龄在30至39岁(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为58.9%,帕克兰健康中心为60.9%),且已知合并症较少或无合并症(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为81.2%,帕克兰健康中心为85.6%)。种族和族裔、保险状况及社会经济地位反映了更广泛的患者群体特征。只有一半的患者(45.5%)在治疗后30个月内完成了两次监测联合检查(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为55.3%,帕克兰健康中心为40.6%),其中三分之一至少有一次后续联合检查结果异常(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为30.9%,帕克兰健康中心为31.6%)。完成两次联合检查的患者观察时间长于未完成两次联合检查的患者(马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院中位数为64.9个月对33.1个月,帕克兰健康中心中位数为63.9个月对41.8个月)。在完成两次联合检查的患者中,监测联合检查的时间在很大程度上符合指南(第一次联合检查的中位时间[四分位间距]:马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为6.4[5.1 - 9.2]个月,帕克兰健康中心为10.1[6.6 - 12.6]个月;第一次和第二次联合检查之间的中位时间[四分位间距]:马萨诸塞州综合医院布莱根分院为8.5[6.0 - 12.6]个月,帕克兰健康中心为12.0[8.0 - 13.5]个月)。总体而言,16例患者(0.5%)在接受高级别发育异常治疗后被诊断为宫颈癌(从治疗到癌症诊断的中位时间[四分位间距]为14.9[3.8 - 45.9]个月)。

结论

约一半的患者在接受高级别发育异常治疗后未接受符合指南的监测,三分之一有后续联合检查结果异常。高级别宫颈发育异常患者后续出现异常的风险升高,应继续密切监测。需要额外的系统监测以确保发育异常治疗后符合指南的监测。