Park Kyung Hye, Lee Ki-Byung, Roh HyeRin
Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Mar;37(1):23-34. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.320. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
Most of studies about racial or ethnic biases among medical students have been conducted in English-speaking developed countries. This study explores the hybridity and transformation of Korean medical students' biases, arguing that a nation's identity and culture are constantly in a state of ever-changing hybridity.
This research used a qualitative document analysis. The study participants were 600 pre-clinical medical students at two medical colleges in Korea, who enrolled in anti-bias programs and subsequently submitted self-reflection essays. Data collection focused on biases related to race, ethnicity, nationality, and medical practices as doctors. Bhabha's cultural hybridity concepts guided the coding of the data in order to explore the hybridity and transformation of the students' biases.
The students presented cultural biases toward patients and doctors with ambivalence related to a person's high socioeconomic status and open-mindedness, as well as doctors' excellence and superiority as Korean authoritative figures. Since the students had ambivalent and complex biases toward patients and doctors, they felt unhomeliness as Korean doctors encountering international patients in Korean clinics. However, after discovering their contradictory assumptions, they transformed their unhomeliness into new hybrid identities. The students' biases were rarely based on race but instead were based on nationality, specifically national class by national income.
Understanding the changing hybrid nature of identities and culture from a cultural hybridity perspective could help clarify medical students' complex and changing biases and improve anti-bias education. Korean medical students' hybridized positions suggest that anti-bias education goes beyond focusing on prestige or racism.
大多数关于医学生种族或民族偏见的研究是在英语国家开展的。本研究探讨韩国医学生偏见的混杂性与转变,认为一个国家的身份和文化始终处于不断变化的混杂状态。
本研究采用定性文献分析法。研究参与者为韩国两所医学院的600名临床前医学生,他们参加了反偏见项目并随后提交了自我反思文章。数据收集聚焦于与种族、民族、国籍以及作为医生的医疗实践相关的偏见。巴哈的文化混杂概念指导数据编码,以探究学生偏见的混杂性与转变。
学生们对患者和医生表现出文化偏见,这种偏见与一个人的高社会经济地位和开放心态、以及医生作为韩国权威人物的卓越和优越性有关。由于学生们对患者和医生有着矛盾复杂的偏见,他们作为韩国医生在韩国诊所遇到国际患者时会感到不自在。然而,在发现自己矛盾的假设后,他们将这种不自在转变为新的混杂身份。学生们的偏见很少基于种族,而是基于国籍,特别是按国民收入划分的国家阶层。
从文化混杂的角度理解身份和文化不断变化的混杂本质,有助于厘清医学生复杂多变的偏见并改进反偏见教育。韩国医学生的混杂立场表明,反偏见教育不应局限于声望或种族主义。