Dias Lizziane Andrade, de Jesus Gilmar Mercês, Vieira Graciete Oliveira
Postgraduate Program in Public Health, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, CEP: 44036-900, Brazil.
, Rua Araraquara, n 10, Condomínio Parque Lagoa Grande, Quadra B, Bloco 17, apto. 302, CASEB, Feria de Santana, Bahia, CEP: 44052-061, Brasil.
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05522-x.
Studies on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) patterns contribute to planning specifically-population-targeted health interventions. However, most do not assess PA and SB based on types. The current study identified patterns of PA and SB based on types and their association with demographic factors (age, school shift) and weekly attendance in physical education classes (PEC) among schoolchildren.
Students from 11 Brazilian public schools with part-time schedules participated in this cross-sectional study in 2019 (n = 2,477; 9.1 ± 1.38 years, 53.2% girls). Participants self-reported PA, SB, and weekly attendance PEC in an online questionnaire. Data on age and school shift were gathered from the Municipal Education Department. PA and SB patterns were identified through a two-step cluster analysis, stratified by sex. The associations between PA and SB patterns and age (7-9 years old; 10-12 years old), school shift (morning; afternoon), and weekly attendance PEC (0/week; 1/week; ≥2/week) were analyzed by Logistic Regression.
Among girls, two distinct patterns emerged: "Active players" (n = 549, 44.1%) and "Sedentary/Household chores performers" (n = 697, 55.9%); and three patterns among boys: "Active play/Structured PA practitioners" (n = 322, 29.8%), "Sedentary on screen" (n = 369, 34.1%), and "Sedentary on academic tasks" (n = 390, 36.1%). Weekly attendance in PEC was associated with the composition of patterns for both girls and boys. Among boys, the 'Sedentary on screen' group was more likely to be in the 10-12 years age group.
Boys and girls exhibited different PA and SB patterns. Active play and household chores contributed to the cluster solution among girls, whereas sports contributed to the cluster solution among boys. Attending PEC increased the odds of participants belonging to clusters with higher PA and lower SB. Identifying patterns of PA and SB by type, along with their associated factors, could inform intervention studies and help shape actions at the school level to increase PA and reduce SB among schoolchildren.
Not applicable.
对身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)模式的研究有助于规划针对特定人群的健康干预措施。然而,大多数研究并未按类型评估PA和SB。本研究确定了基于类型的PA和SB模式及其与学童人口统计学因素(年龄、上学时段)和每周体育课出勤情况(PEC)的关联。
来自11所实行非全日制课程的巴西公立学校的学生于2019年参与了这项横断面研究(n = 2477;9.1±1.38岁,53.2%为女生)。参与者通过在线问卷自我报告PA、SB和每周PEC出勤情况。年龄和上学时段的数据从市教育局收集。通过两步聚类分析确定PA和SB模式,并按性别分层。通过逻辑回归分析PA和SB模式与年龄(7 - 9岁;10 - 12岁)、上学时段(上午;下午)以及每周PEC出勤情况(0次/周;1次/周;≥2次/周)之间的关联。
在女孩中出现了两种不同模式:“活跃参与者”(n = 549,44.1%)和“久坐/做家务者”(n = 697,55.9%);在男孩中出现了三种模式:“活跃玩耍/有组织的PA践行者”(n = 322,29.8%)、“屏幕前久坐者”(n = 369,34.1%)和“学业任务前久坐者”(n = 390,36.1%)。每周PEC出勤情况与女孩和男孩的模式构成均相关。在男孩中,“屏幕前久坐”组更可能处于10 - 12岁年龄组。
男孩和女孩表现出不同的PA和SB模式。活跃玩耍和做家务促成了女孩的聚类结果,而体育运动促成了男孩的聚类结果。参加PEC增加了参与者属于PA水平较高和SB水平较低聚类的几率。按类型确定PA和SB模式及其相关因素可为干预研究提供信息,并有助于制定学校层面的行动,以增加学童的PA并减少SB。
不适用。