Suppr超能文献

融合术和关节成形术对从事体力要求较高职业的颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者的影响。

Effect of fusion and arthroplasty for cervical degenerative disc disease in patients with physically demanding occupations.

作者信息

Uppal Harjot, Abdelmalek George, Patel Neil, Coban Daniel, Changoor Stuart, Sahai Nikhil, Sinha Kumar, Hwang Ki, Emami Arash

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ 07470, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jan 27;21:100590. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100590. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) significantly affects the quality of life in labor-intensive careers. When conservative measures fail, either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) may be indicated. Although ACDF is the gold standard, it can limit motion, whereas CDA preserves motion and may reduce adjacent segment disease (ASD). Few studies compare these surgeries in physically demanding populations, and the influence of workers' compensation (WC) on outcomes is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of CDA versus ACDF in patients with labor-intensive jobs and to assess how workers' compensation (WC) status influences these outcomes.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 300 (CDA: 150, ACDF: 150) patients with 1- or 2-level cervical DDD with labor-intensive jobs were enrolled, including a subgroup of 60 WC patients (CDA: 30, ACDF: 30). Participants were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Data collected included demographic details, perioperative events, and complication rates. Functional outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale for neck and arm pain (VAS-neck, VAS-arm) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), with attention to timelines for returning to full-time work.

RESULTS

CDA patients returned to full-time work faster (4.3 vs 6.7 months, p=.025). More CDA patients resumed work by 6 weeks (p=.018) and 3 months (p=.022), though these differences waned by 6 months. WC patients had slower returns overall (CDA WC: 7.5 vs 5.0 weeks for non-WC, p=.015). CDA showed greater NDI improvement at all time points and significantly lower ASD incidence (1.3% vs. 26.7%, p<.001). Complications were comparable.

CONCLUSION

CDA may facilitate faster work return, better recovery, and lower ASD risk in labor-intensive patients. WC status correlates with delayed recovery, suggesting a need for tailored approaches. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and refine patient selection.

摘要

背景

颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)严重影响从事劳动密集型职业者的生活质量。当保守治疗无效时,可能需要进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)或颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)。虽然ACDF是金标准,但它会限制活动,而CDA能保留活动度并可能减少相邻节段疾病(ASD)。很少有研究在对身体要求较高的人群中比较这两种手术,而且工伤赔偿(WC)对手术结果的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较CDA和ACDF在从事劳动密集型工作的患者中的手术结果,并评估工伤赔偿(WC)状态如何影响这些结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了300例患有1或2节段颈椎DDD且从事劳动密集型工作的患者(CDA组:150例,ACDF组:150例),其中包括一个60例工伤赔偿患者的亚组(CDA组:30例,ACDF组:30例)。对参与者进行至少2年的随访。收集的数据包括人口统计学细节、围手术期事件和并发症发生率。使用颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-颈部、VAS-手臂)和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)来衡量功能结果,并关注恢复全职工作的时间线。

结果

CDA组患者恢复全职工作的速度更快(4.3个月对6.7个月,p = 0.025)。更多CDA组患者在6周(p = 0.018)和3个月(p = 0.022)时恢复工作,不过这些差异在6个月时减弱。工伤赔偿患者总体恢复较慢(CDA工伤赔偿组:7.5周对非工伤赔偿组的5.0周,p = 0.015)。CDA组在所有时间点的NDI改善更大,且ASD发生率显著更低(1.3%对26.7%,p < 0.001)。并发症情况相当。

结论

CDA可能有助于从事劳动密集型工作的患者更快恢复工作、更好地康复并降低ASD风险。工伤赔偿状态与恢复延迟相关,这表明需要采取针对性的方法。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现并优化患者选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f646/11883391/348d2e77c173/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验